It's not the end of the world debating another new stadium in this thread and is appropriate at this time. The thread will move on as it becomes old news. I think it is very relevant to contrast the relative success of converting two stadiums used for athletics into football stadiums. Looks like ours was thought thru better.
Totally agree mate, both converted to football from athletics and in my opion I agree that City have a better football stadium, ours was designed to be a football stadium that during it' construction would be used for athletics whilst In West Hams new home football was an after thought when the stake holders realised that they would be left with an embarrassing legacy from the olympics if they couldn't find a tennant after the games.