Etihad Campus, Stadium and Collar Site Development Thread

Whilst you may be right, it should be the next can of worms to be opened re state funding/FFP/PSR?
It is hard to see how West Hams near free deal on the Olympic Stadium is not classed as state aid and treated in the same way as interest free loans when it comes to FFP/PSR because of the financial advantage it confers. What a can of worms has been opened?
 
It is hard to see how West Hams near free deal on the Olympic Stadium is not classed as state aid and treated in the same way as interest free loans when it comes to FFP/PSR because of the financial advantage it confers. What a can of worms has been opened?
I suppose the argument can be made that West Ham just took advantage of the desperation of the Olympic Legacy Commission to find a user. Tottenham would have taken it had they been allowed to bulldoze the whole thing and build a new football stadium on the site.

But this was not allowed because the athletics lobby wanted to retain the running track, presumably to hold a meeting every two or three years and costing millions to take out and then replace the temporary seating above the track every meeting. With no other user on the cards, West Ham could dictate their own terms.

The City of Manchester Stadium, needed an end-user from the start, otherwise it would never have been built in the first place. Realistically that could only have been United (very unlikely) or City.

The conception ruled out a dedicated athletics stadium and ensured that it would be reconfigured as a football stadium after the games. This left a stadium that was well designed and not a dog's breakfast like the City of London Stadium.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.