The reason I suggest is that a certain Spanish gentlemen I have dealings with who was working at city when we did the first stand spoke about viability for the second. If I remember correctly he spoke about an indoor city square or arena which would help justify the cost of expansion. The first stand was effectively made possible by the extra costs of the 93.20 and the tunnel club rather than the extra 6000 seats. He spoke to me saying the corporate was pretty much at its limit so he had to come up with something clever to make the business plan for the other end work.
No one has come up with the actual location for the arena and we could build one that effectively starts (underground like our stadium) at the area where city square is now. I may be wrong with this one but it maybe I am bang on.
The NIA in Birmingham is like that, there are two big 6 a side pitches under it with gym stuff too, but the arena itself would surely need to be away from the stadium. The Spanish are well into their basket ball, but Manchester already has the biggest basketball arena in Europe.
At that end I was expecting a mid-market food offer that any fan could access before and after games, sit down restaurant stuff, as the surveys were trying to test the demand. Unless there was little demand demonstrable.