BrianW
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Mar 2006
- Messages
- 5,937
- Team supported
- There's Only One City
In Germany, they pay a much higher proportion of GDP in tax, and their GDP is larger than ours. So their public services are (generally) much better.
You end up paying one way or another. In the world of transport, the price of low taxes is high fares and shit services. Of course, if you don't use public transport you pay in another, less obvious way. Increased congestion and high parking charges. And higher maintenance and insurance costs because of the shit condition of the roads. Either way, you pay.
Of course, you might say that some aspects of government spending could but cut. But the minute you get beyond that simple statement you enter controversy because one person's 'unnecessary' is another's sacred cow. For example, I think we could get rid of 99% of the ornamental and ceremonial aspects of the state, but I admit it would save relative buttons and would upset a lot of people.
You end up paying one way or another. In the world of transport, the price of low taxes is high fares and shit services. Of course, if you don't use public transport you pay in another, less obvious way. Increased congestion and high parking charges. And higher maintenance and insurance costs because of the shit condition of the roads. Either way, you pay.
Of course, you might say that some aspects of government spending could but cut. But the minute you get beyond that simple statement you enter controversy because one person's 'unnecessary' is another's sacred cow. For example, I think we could get rid of 99% of the ornamental and ceremonial aspects of the state, but I admit it would save relative buttons and would upset a lot of people.