LEXSTARproject
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Sep 2022
- Messages
- 993
Last edited:
If you think NBH looked like that you've got some belting Rose tinted glasses or were just out of your face when you went there.It looks a lot like Bingley Hall back in the 70s.
Mate of mine was on a date many years ago when they got to the bar the girl said don't look now but Rick Astley is at the end of the bar, mate nodded and said nothing. Ten minutes later Rick came walking past stopped and said Steve, how are you gave him a man hug and stood chatting for awhile. He was in his class at school. Said the date went wellCo-op test event scheduled for 19/20th April. I believe Rick Astley will be performing.
so many bar areas, is there any roon for the event hal ?View attachment 111355
View attachment 111356
View attachment 111357
View attachment 111358
View attachment 111359
By the looks of picture 3 a non-event day, Canalside will be open on matchdays and the area pictured in picture 5 will also be open, this will be an amazing place for city fans to meet
Coop Live at the end
Coop Live at the end
As I understand it the club have a roughly 250 year lease on the stadium with a fixed formula for annual rent that the council can’t unilaterally change. That means it’s effectively the same as owning it but the council tax payers of Manchester get an ongoing income that’s a pittance for the club, and the club gets to keep the money it would cost to buy it outright. It’s beneficial for both sides and the club keep an ongoing good relationship with the council which doubtless helps with getting planning applications approved without undesirable amendments.I wonder if anyone can explain to me why a company would spend 300 million on a stadium they don't own? (over and above the extra income of 9000 tickets and hospitality income). Also the relationship that the collar site (CFG owned?) has with the stadium. Do City own the hotel and offices? Where is the dividing line drawn between the stadium and the new bit?
It feels complicated to me. Genuine question.
Also City own the hotel and offices, plus joint venture of the ArenaAs I understand it the club have a roughly 250 year lease on the stadium with a fixed formula for annual rent that the council can’t unilaterally change. That means it’s effectively the same as owning it but the council tax payers of Manchester get an ongoing income that’s a pittance for the club, and the club gets to keep the money it would cost to buy it outright. It’s beneficial for both sides and the club keep an ongoing good relationship with the council which doubtless helps with getting planning applications approved without undesirable amendments.
I wonder if anyone can explain to me why a company would spend 300 million on a stadium they don't own? (over and above the extra income of 9000 tickets and hospitality income). Also the relationship that the collar site (CFG owned?) has with the stadium. Do City own the hotel and offices? Where is the dividing line drawn between the stadium and the new bit?
It feels complicated to me. Genuine question.
I’ll add some possible reasons. I stand corrected on what I’m posting. Feel free. :-)
1. Additional match day revenue and annual income.
2. Hosting CL and Europa cup finals. 60,000+ capacity
3. It’s a 250 year lease, so additional match day income will also cover the the lease cost, which is currently between £4mill-£5mill a year. Stand corrected on that.
4. City will make the £300mill back at some point in the future. Then it will be pure profit from the stand, hotel, museum, retail, offices, the sky walk, events, conferences, etc.
5. Outside of the match day, the stand, hotel, retail, offices, bars, restaurants etc will make additional income, compared to the North stand now, which makes nothing outside of match days.
6. I think, think, City own the Collar site? They own most or all of the Etihad Campus. MCC have some say on the Collar site. What the actual relationship and partnership between the club and MCC regarding the Collar site is anyones guess. It’s shrouded in a bit of secrecy.
7. City and MCC are working together to deliver an appropriate use for the Collar site that will bring further investment, jobs, and possibly education to the area. But we don’t know what that is still.
These comments could be related to the future of the Collar site? An AI education campus on the Collar site, plus additional education and other buildings? But that’s me just guessing, nothing more.
Marty Edelman spoke at MIPIM about his relationship with the city council
The second plateau may involve some housing, but really we’re more focused on thinking about job creation – and when you think about job creation, we think about skills,” he continued.
“What we need to do is create educational places where young people can learn those skills that are relevant to a world in which AI is perhaps the future and the computer, in a way, is the past. I want to focus Man Life to see if we can create those spaces, which will provide opportunity for educating young people so they have a pathway to jobs.”
![]()
MIPIM | Manchester Life ponders shift away from resi - Place North West
The completion of Manchester Life’s residential-led plans for Ancoats may be in their final phase, but the partnership between Acre Real Estate and Manchester City Council is far from finished, according to Marty Edelman.www.placenorthwest.co.uk
which collar site is this you mentioning?
Not the area they have lined up next to the Campus for extension work for the women team?
No, opposite the East stand.
The site you’ve mentioned is part of the CFA.
![]()
Manchester City Women submit plans for purpose-built training facility
Manchester City Women have submitted a planning application to Manchester City Council for the development of a purpose-built training facility at our training centre, City Football Academy.www.mancity.com
Thanks JRB. I thought you would have an idea. I knew some of it. I suppose at the back of my mind is, what would MCC do if City walked away and built a new stadium, but that sounds ridiculous as I type it. It seems that every added construction confirms ADUG's commitment to the city. It's just strange that we own the crown but not the jewels!I’ll add some possible reasons. I stand corrected on what I’m posting. Feel free. :-)
1. Additional match day revenue and annual income.
2. Hosting CL and Europa cup finals. 60,000+ capacity
3. It’s a 250 year lease, so additional match day income will also cover the the lease cost, which is currently between £4mill-£5mill a year. Stand corrected on that.
4. City will make the £300mill back at some point in the future. Then it will be pure profit from the stand, hotel, museum, retail, offices, the sky walk, events, conferences, etc.
5. Outside of the match day, the stand, hotel, retail, offices, bars, restaurants etc will make additional income, compared to the North stand now, which makes nothing outside of match days.
6. I think, think, City own the Collar site? They own most or all of the Etihad Campus. MCC have some say on the Collar site. What the actual relationship and partnership between the club and MCC regarding the Collar site is anyones guess. It’s shrouded in a bit of secrecy.
7. City and MCC are working together to deliver an appropriate use for the Collar site that will bring further investment, jobs, and possibly education to the area. But we don’t know what that is still.
These comments could be related to the future of the Collar site? An AI education campus on the Collar site, plus additional education and other buildings? But that’s me just guessing, nothing more.
Marty Edelman spoke at MIPIM about his relationship with the city council
The second plateau may involve some housing, but really we’re more focused on thinking about job creation – and when you think about job creation, we think about skills,” he continued.
“What we need to do is create educational places where young people can learn those skills that are relevant to a world in which AI is perhaps the future and the computer, in a way, is the past. I want to focus Man Life to see if we can create those spaces, which will provide opportunity for educating young people so they have a pathway to jobs.”
![]()
MIPIM | Manchester Life ponders shift away from resi - Place North West
The completion of Manchester Life’s residential-led plans for Ancoats may be in their final phase, but the partnership between Acre Real Estate and Manchester City Council is far from finished, according to Marty Edelman.www.placenorthwest.co.uk