EU referendum deal (title edited)

[EalingBlue2]

Agreed, and this can't be a surprise, humans have been doing that since time immemorial.

Honestly, I don't think a knee jerkey referendum is the way to deal with this issue

It is entirely plausible that both sides arguments are lying and scaremongering

It appears to me neither side really understands even a fraction of the issues and consequences , neither side really is prepared to understand the views of the other side and neither side is prepared to do anything other than use emotional falsehoods to try to win.

But that's probably because it's all a big furfee, in or out isn't tackling the real issues its moving deckchairs and until there is serious honest discourse and politicians start to accept that real sacrifices have to be made whatever is to happen its kind of irellevant. Until both sides accept that their stereotypes of the other side are just wishful ignorance it will be a nonsense too.

 

[masterwig]

Keep saying it but this is the kind of decision we elect people with time and resources to really look into the pros and cons to decide. I don't think the general public has anywhere near the level of understanding required to make such a momentous decision.

Perhaps the campaign will raise that awareness but as has been pointed out previously, there's a lot of falsehood on the issue portrayed as fact and a large percentage of people have made up their minds based on said falsehoods.

If we have a referendum I'll vote to stay in but that's probably if I'm honest a vote against nationalism rather than a strong belief in the EU in it's current form.

 

[CityStu]

Keep saying it but this is the kind of decision we elect people with time and resources to really look into the pros and cons to decide. I don't think the general public has anywhere near the level of understanding required to make such a momentous decision.

Perhaps the campaign will raise that awareness but as has been pointed out previously, there's a lot of falsehood on the issue portrayed as fact and a large percentage of people have made up their minds based on said falsehoods.

If we have a referendum I'll vote to stay in but that's probably if I'm honest a vote against nationalism rather than a strong belief in the EU in it's current form.

I don't think MPs have anywhere near the objectivity for such a decision. Most could probably be eligible for cushty EU jobs after their time in the UK parliament. Turkeys don't vote for Christmas.

 

[cibaman]

I don't think MPs have anywhere near the objectivity for such a decision. Most could probably be eligible for cushty EU jobs after their time in the UK parliament. Turkeys don't vote for Christmas.

Who else could, or should, make such a decision apart from either Parliament or the people in a referendum?

 

[EalingBlue2]

Who else could, or should, make such a decision apart from either Parliament or the people in a referendum?

No one could bar the people for precisely the reason above , big business, the civil service, the politicians, even the judiciary would all be called biased and nose in the trough if there was any other vote than out. Because the drivers of the out campaign and quite possibly the in campaign will never accept the validity of a vote win by the other side.

If we vote in or out from that point on the other side will be talking down the country and economy every second they can and will be blaming every single bad thing that happens on the vote.

So no one can ever decide legitimately as no one will ever accept the other side could be right and both sides will dodge , weave, lie and twist facts because nowadays that is what politics is about!

 

[CityStu]

Who else could, or should, make such a decision apart from either Parliament or the people in a referendum?

I think it being put to the people in a referendum is the right call. I think it's unlikely, but I'd hope unbiased facts could be made available to all voters about all things EU - things like how much it costs us, our net contribution and how that compares to other countries, projects the EU has funded, laws the EU has brought in and evidence of their impact in the UK, etc. Making people more informed without influencing them in or out due to the wording or amount of positive/negative content.

 

[masterwig]

I don't think MPs have anywhere near the objectivity for such a decision. Most could probably be eligible for cushty EU jobs after their time in the UK parliament. Turkeys don't vote for Christmas.

We had a general election less than a year ago. Voters were free to ask their candidates what their stance was on Europe and vote accordingly. Some candidates even made it a cornerstone of their platform.

Instead of an expensive and distracting referendum campaign why not trust the judgement of the electorate from last year? Major downside to that is politicians don't always do what they say!

Maybe you're right we should ask the people. I just don't trust the people to make an informed decision. I actually think turnout will be low because for everyone who has a strong option there are two people who don't understand enough to care. Walk round town and ask shoppers to describe the pros and cons of EU membership and most would struggle to come up with anything in depth and substantial either way.

I can see it now:

"Health and safety gone mad"
"Children can't sing ba ba black sheep any more"
"They've banned Christmas"

 

[CityStu]

We had a general election less than a year ago. Voters were free to ask their candidates what their stance was on Europe and vote accordingly. Some candidates even made it a cornerstone of their platform.

Instead of an expensive and distracting referendum campaign why not trust the judgement of the electorate from last year? Major downside to that is politicians don't always do what they say!

Maybe you're right we should ask the people. I just don't trust the people to make an informed decision. I actually think turnout will be low because for everyone who has a strong option there are two people who don't understand enough to care. Walk round town and ask shoppers to describe the pros and cons of EU membership and most would struggle to come up with anything in depth and substantial either way.

I can see it now:

"Health and safety gone mad"
"Children can't sing ba ba black sheep any more"
"They've banned Christmas"

But over half of those who voted did so for a party that was promising a referendum in their manifesto.

I think most people have an opinion on the EU and reckon that turnout will be similar to the GE. I do agree that most are probably ill-informed though, or have made opinions based on the opinions of others/media, rather than the facts. I think that getting the in and out campaigns to sit down together and produce a document of important facts about the EU that neither thought biased would be a good addition to the voting material people are sent.

 

[cibaman]

I think it being put to the people in a referendum is the right call. I think it's unlikely, but I'd hope unbiased facts could be made available to all voters about all things EU - things like how much it costs us, our net contribution and how that compares to other countries, projects the EU has funded, laws the EU has brought in and evidence of their impact in the UK, etc. Making people more informed without influencing them in or out due to the wording or amount of positive/negative content.

The decision can't just be based on unbiased facts, it comes down to judgement calls on how the EU will develop in the future and how the UK's trading relationship with the EU would be affected by exit. Both are matters of opinion rather than facts

 

[CityStu]

The decision can't just be based on unbiased facts, it comes down to judgement calls on how the EU will develop in the future and how the UK's trading relationship with the EU would be affected by exit. Both are matters of opinion rather than facts

But each individual has to make those judgement calls on the basis of facts. How can anyone predict how the trading relationship would change if they don't know what we gain/lose from it now? Things like the proportion of our imports/exports that are traded with the EU, some example trading costs with non-EU countries, etc. I appreciate that that information is probably available somewhere, but it should be given to people rather than making them search for it off their own back.