steviemc
Well-Known Member
Yeah but as you say you didn't go to bed after voting in 1975 and wake up in 2016 - Lisbon and Maastricht were not subject to referendums but were hotly debated and whilst there was no direct yes/no vote on their implementation in general elections afterwards to eject MP's and governments who backed the treaties. As that didn't happen I assume that there was not the extent of disquiet required to force a change in attitude?
We haven't just got here, the EU has evolved over that period and its done so with everyone's knowledge - its only in recent years with the rise of the xenophobic UKIP bandwagon that its go traction ad - in my view - most people who are pro-leave are being sold a pup propagated on lies that will be very bad for the UK.
I strongly disagree. I believe that the rise in recent years of access to information has allowed people become much more informed about what the EU consists of, what it actually does, and the key roles played by unelected bureaucrats. The xenophobic argument becomes rather a moot point when you consider the number of potential voters wishing to leave the EU. Would you like to suggest a percentage figure of how many citizens voting to leave you believe are xenophobic?