Everton (A) | Game Postponed

Yes they could have added that into the statement and in not doing so probably makes it sound more heartless than they probably intended.

I hope they put out another statement soon wishing the players well.
Too late
True colours showed now
Be whining tomorrow if we infected their squad.
 
How difficult is it to understand that the squad (all players plus coaches) were together just 48 hours ago (playing Newcastle on Boxing Day) and now today’s test suggest a further 5 positive COVID cases (in addition to 4 in last round of testing) ... so everyone in that squad has been in close contact/exposed ... whether they catch it or not is something no one can tell but guideline is to self isolate till another round of tests is done and if you get two consecutive tests 48 hrs apart you can’t be sure ... did Everton or anyone for that matter want to play against the team who have been exposed to confirmed multiple Covid cases??

Question of fielding 14 players doesn’t arise as the squad hasn’t been able to have two rounds of tests ... that’s what happens when you arange games only 46 hrs apart ... we’ll have two more rounds of tests this week and then if we have 14 players available then Chelsea game would go ahead ... it’s quite simple ... only issue has come due to back to back fixture scheduling and not enough time in between for tests to be carried out ...

This above is for elite sports btw, the common man’s guidance is you come in contact with someone who tests positive, you don’t even get tested and still have to self isolate for 10 days ... and even if you don’t have any symptoms as you could still carry it from that positive case and onto someone else ...
Perfectly explained , it is the congestion of fixtures that has caused the short notice , but it will be twisted so we are trying to gain an advantage and bend the rules , we could be off to CAS again.
 
That 14 available player thing needs to be fucked off too, thats not helping the hysteria.

If you only have 14 players available then that suggests that Covid is rife and more than just an isolated incident. No team should be playing anyone if thats the case

Nail on head here. I actually think this rule is what's causing all of the ruckus.

It is a problematic rule that was not thought through clearly or maybe more fair is to say they didn't quite consider this kind of situation and hoped for the best.

I would say the same even if this happened to our biggest rivals.
 
Also, the context of a massive bump in cases in the UK and London has to be taken into account (where we are hearing the City spread may have come from). City were in London to play Arsenal. Was that what led to it?

Were some City players wildly negligent? Maybe, but even if it was just 1 player or 2, they then are affecting many who did NOTHING and may have followed all of the rules.

The entire team is then suffering because of this.

It's not the same as a regular injury and playing without them because your injury doesn't affect other people's ability to play a game physically.
 
That 14 available player thing needs to be fucked off too, thats not helping the hysteria.

If you only have 14 players available then that suggests that Covid is rife and more than just an isolated incident. No team should be playing anyone if thats the case
Great point - totally agree - as infections inevitably rise in line with the rest of the country they’ll be changing games to 5 a side rather than call them off......
 
What might make sense to ask is why have the City players' names not been released? We now hear Ederson (who else)

I am not suggesting Everton are saints here AT ALL, but I wonder if they feel:

1) The total players City would have out for the game would NOT be enough to postpone the game

2) City waited until the last minute to announce the cases and then be vague because they knew this would allow for a postponement

3) City are doing this basically because they would have lost several key players at the very last minute which would put them at a disadvantage in a huge game but they agreed to the rules for COVID so they should have to deal

Am I missing anything else?

I can also list critiques of ALL 3 of these views.
4) Dear Everton, we've had to pull half a dozen players because they've got this potential to pass on a killer virus to your players and staff.
But don't worry, we've got another 15 players who can play and don't worry, we know they've been with the others but we're sure they are ok because they've tested negative just like the others who tested negative last week.
 
Were some City players wildly negligent? Maybe, but even if it was just 1 player or 2, they then are affecting many who did NOTHING and may have followed all of the rules.
There is ZERO evidence anybody was acting "wildly", so it shouldn't even be mentioned. I do think the players should be cautioned about the celebrations, but that's players at all clubs, they could all ACT better for me, close contact should be discouraged.
 
I think the rule should have been if 3 or more players contract COVID within X window of time, games are automatically postponed for saftey and investigation.

If it is determined any players were not "clearly and obviously" (you like that one?) negligent in their behaviour then the game will be re-scheduled

Any negligent players found to be so after the investigation are then suspended for 1 game depending on what is found and cannot participate in the replay against the other side or if injured during that game must be suspended for the next available PL fixture.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.