Everton (H) Post-Match Thread

[cleavers]

As MotD didn't show the penalty claim or the Calvert-Lewin foul, any chance of clips being posted?

They didn't happen ;-)

 

[Proy]

Just had another look at the Foden pen.

It's a penalty. Defender makes no contact with the ball and made a challenge. Phil does kick him, but that's only because the defenders leg is there. If you make that challenge you have to win the ball and he didn't do that.

It's a weird one, but that is a penalty for me.

 

[simon23]

Not in my opinion it didn't. Their donkey up front should have had a red card.

thats the only one of the decisions I would question...think there was intent with what he did (but intent is always the difficult/virtually impossible bit to prove)

 

[Eccles Blue]

We managed for 131 years without VAR farce, let’s manage for 131 more!

 

[blue is best]

Just had another look at the Foden pen.

It's a penalty. Defender makes no contact with the ball and made a challenge. Phil does kick him, but that's only because the defenders leg is there. If you make that challenge you have to win the ball and he didn't do that.

It's a weird one, but that is a penalty for me.

I can’t remember who they were playing but I recall the dippers getting a penalty for exactly that, Mane went to kick the ball, defender puts his foot in front Mane kicks said foot and goes down, penalty awarded, how unusual they get it and we don’t!

 

[platty7]

I can’t remember who they were playing but I recall the dippers getting a penalty for exactly that, Mane went to kick the ball, defender puts his foot in front Mane kicks said foot and goes down, penalty awarded, how unusual they get it and we don’t!

Against spurs it was

 

[kinky's boots]

They must off wondered what was under the coat mate..

They were worried it was nothing at all... :/

 

[Bluekiwi]

As MotD didn't show the penalty claim or the Calvert-Lewin foul, any chance of clips being posted?

They are in the clip on the OS

 

[balotellishaircut]

We managed for 131 years without VAR farce, let’s manage for 131 more!

Your discounting they want the dippers to win the league, right from the beginning, that's why VAR was introduced.

 

[Dirty Harry]

Just had another look at the Foden pen.

It's a penalty. Defender makes no contact with the ball and made a challenge. Phil does kick him, but that's only because the defenders leg is there. If you make that challenge you have to win the ball and he didn't do that.

It's a weird one, but that is a penalty for me.

Just mentioned this on another thread, although I think the defender gets the slightest of touches on the ball, to me, it looks like he still impedes Foden from getting his shot away with the follow on, wouldn't like it given against us, but I still think it merits a penalty.

 

[s1ty m]

Not in my opinion it didn't. Their donkey up front should have had a red card.

And a penalty when Foden was fouled. Even though Andy Hinchcliffe miraculously deemed it a good tackle on the first and only replay from a poor angle.

 

[jamiecav]

They are in the clip on the OS

2 things on that tackle. 1 it was a red. 2, why was it left to our youngest player to get in cl face

 

[Rolee]

thats the only one of the decisions I would question...think there was intent with what he did (but intent is always the difficult/virtually impossible bit to prove)

Don't need to prove intent, if it's excessive and endangers the safety of opponent it's red.

 

[Shuffs]

I can’t remember who they were playing but I recall the dippers getting a penalty for exactly that, Mane went to kick the ball, defender puts his foot in front Mane kicks said foot and goes down, penalty awarded, how unusual they get it and we don’t!

Yeah, Vs Spuds....though the defender had complete control of the ball and was in the process of clearing the ball, when Mane put his foot in and was "fouled"

 

[KS55]

Anyone who thinks that Bravo is a good enough replacement for Eddie, please report to Matron.

Hello matron, my name's Josep.

 

[Mad Eyed Screamer]

And a penalty when Foden was fouled. Even though Andy Hinchcliffe miraculously deemed it a good tackle on the first and only replay from a poor angle.

I said that to myself at the time.... One and only one very brief replay without warning. I must have blinked and the next thing is Hinchcliffe is informing us it was the correct decision. Not even discussed at half time!

 

[Sky Blue]

Eldest lad had a hangover so blagged his season card and went with my other lad. Thought we played really well and a bit more solid with the new formation. VAR has now reduced me to not cheering any goal and Foden's disallowed one killed the atmosphere stone dead. Fern was fucking brilliant and Gab took his goals well, Mendy excellent too. Looked a really bad foul on Fernandinho at the end, proper dangerous but no surprise with a yellow from that shithouse Marriner.

Everton fans were piss poor, hardly a peep 'til they scored.

Got in to see Arsenal score so good day all round :)

 

[KS55]

Just looking at Evertons goal again.....Bravo has a perfectly good pass available to his right, so he puts it in an area where thère are three attackers. Brainless.

 

[Marvin]

We played a good game with a much-changed side. We changed formation and the players knew their roles and did it well.

Jesus fantastic. No question MoM. Everton were very defensive and it took some individual moments of magic to score. Jesus produced. Again.

 

[Millwallawayveteran1988]

I said that to myself at the time.... One and only one very brief replay without warning. I must have blinked and the next thing is Hinchcliffe is informing us it was the correct decision. Not even discussed at half time!

it happened in the second half so can’t blame em for not discussing it before it happened :-)