jay_mcfc said:
Mate if you think Tevez, Toure, Kompany and De Jong aren't performing much better than they were under Hughes then you're wrong.
Well provide some evidence then. Talk is cheap.
Hart came back under Mancini and has been excellent so as well as what happened at Birmingham, Mancini takes credit for starting him.
Hughes takes credit for loaning him to Birmingham, which gave him more experience and improved his performances.
Therefore, Hughes takes as much credit for a better Hart as Mancini.
I was right about Hughes and your counter arguement doesn't fit;
Yes it did. You claimed you was "proven right" in your assesment. Yet Mancini never got us to fourth. So - how does this prove you was right, then?
I said he was a rubbish manager for us
"Rubbish manager for us"? As has been said, he put the spine of this present team together and is the ONLY manager in over 20 odd years to get us to a semi of a cup.
What's our cup record under Mancini?
How many points better off are we now than this time last season?
Are we playing far better, more entertaining football now than we had this time last season?
While Hughes had his faults, your wild claims that he was a "rubbish manager" are ridiculous.
We're no better off this season? Well we're 4th
I think you'll find we are joint 5th.
and a win today we go 3 points behind top.
And a loss today and we're only 8 points above the relegation zone.
If that's not improvement then God knows what is.
WTF?
Despite spending around £135m on players, Mancini's record this season is worse than Hughes' last term, with the
same points accrued after 13 games but with an inferior goal difference.
Some "improvement"!