F*** the Jubilee

[St Helens Blue (Exiled)]

Re: F*** the Jubliee

Thats probably the best post on this thread...

I wonder if all the haters could answer it..

Go on Go on please do..

Mate-I asked exactly the same earlier on in the thread. Chrism the tax dodger stated it ws different as he is a business man or words to that effect.!!! YCNMIU!!

HRH QUEEN ELIZABETH
HRH SHEIKH MANSOUR

Love them both...

Nice one..

Amazing though isnt it,what would happen if the sheik got the queens abuse on here...

Some bell ends about!

They would become royalists in any shape or form if Sheikh Mansour was a knocking on their front door so to speak!

 

[cyberblue]

Re: F*** the Jubliee

The Belgrano was a legitimate military target and was successfully prosecuted as such. Saving British lives. Rejoice.

I for one wont rejoice at the loss of hundreds of young sailors what ever country they are from it was because of that incident that they took revenge & sunk HMS Sheffield with the loss of British Sailors .RIP

LOL Sure they did. Sheffield posed a threat to the Argentine take over of the Falklands. That was the reason it was sunk. We was at war.

War was never declared .it was a "conflict" if the Belgrano had not been sunk as it was heading away from the Falklands the situation might have been solved diplomaticly .but that was the last thing Thatcher wanted .so the Argentines sunk the HMS Sheffield which at the time was so far away it posed no threat to anyone just like the Belgrano didnt pose a threat

 

[Rammyblues]

Re: F*** the Jubliee

Whether you agree with it or not to use the famous quote


drink it in because you will never see it again.


For them that don't agree treat as a normal day for them that agree lap it up, for them that aren't fussed use it as an excuse to get pissed and enjoy the extra day.

 

[Blue Mist]

Re: F*** the Jubliee

I for one wont rejoice at the loss of hundreds of young sailors what ever country they are from it was because of that incident that they took revenge & sunk HMS Sheffield with the loss of British Sailors .RIP

LOL Sure they did. Sheffield posed a threat to the Argentine take over of the Falklands. That was the reason it was sunk. We was at war.

War was never declared .it was a "conflict" if the Belgrano had not been sunk as it was heading away from the Falklands the situation might have been solved diplomaticly .but that was the last thing Thatcher wanted .so the Argentines sunk the HMS Sheffield which at the time was so far away it posed no threat to anyone

So is it just Argentinian ships that are not allowed turn around or does that count for every ship? Perhaps it didn't have a rudder ? (mind you it had guns) and bearing in mind at the time it was sunk Argentinian soldiers were standing on the Falklands, univited, with guns, so please tell me how you think it could have been settled diplomatically ? By saying Please?

 

[ElanJo]

Re: F*** the Jubliee

 

[smudgedj]

Re: F*** the Jubliee

I for one wont rejoice at the loss of hundreds of young sailors what ever country they are from it was because of that incident that they took revenge & sunk HMS Sheffield with the loss of British Sailors .RIP

LOL Sure they did. Sheffield posed a threat to the Argentine take over of the Falklands. That was the reason it was sunk. We was at war.

War was never declared .it was a "conflict" if the Belgrano had not been sunk as it was heading away from the Falklands the situation might have been solved diplomaticly .but that was the last thing Thatcher wanted .so the Argentines sunk the HMS Sheffield which at the time was so far away it posed no threat to anyone just like the Belgrano didnt pose a threat

Really, OK Falklands conflict. Heading away doesn't make it less of a threat. Ships can turn around.

 

[Lavinda Past]

Re: F*** the Jubliee

Gay.

 

[Vinjay]

Re: F*** the Jubliee

It is more than faintly amusing that the same people who use terms like 'brown nosing' to describe people who have a positive view of the monarchy are the same people who if they met our owner would forget their inherent disdain for hereditary privilege and would be scrabbling for the best means of accessing his back passage.

Thats probably the best post on this thread...

I wonder if all the haters could answer it..

Go on Go on please do..

I brought up that issue. Compare Sheik Mansour and his family's role in running the UAE to that of the Windsors. Plus his chairmanship of various financial monetary funds, institutions, etc. The fact he's only had time to attend one match proves how busy he is and its certainly not because he's holding some garden party or a parade every other week.

Criticism of Elizabeth Windsor and her family does not by any means make you anti-royalist.

 

[Skashion]

Re: F*** the Jubliee

I brought up that issue. Compare Sheik Mansour and his family's role in running the UAE to that of the Windsors. Plus his chairmanship of various financial monetary funds, institutions, etc. The fact he's only had time to attend one match proves how busy he is and its certainly not because he's holding some garden party or a parade every other week.

The Venkys are busy and self-made, perhaps you should support them.

 

[smudgedj]

Re: F*** the Jubliee

It is more than faintly amusing that the same people who use terms like 'brown nosing' to describe people who have a positive view of the monarchy are the same people who if they met our owner would forget their inherent disdain for hereditary privilege and would be scrabbling for the best means of accessing his back passage.

Thats probably the best post on this thread...

I wonder if all the haters could answer it..

Go on Go on please do..

I brought up that issue. Compare Sheik Mansour and his family's role in running the UAE to that of the Windsors. Plus his chairmanship of various financial monetary funds, institutions, etc. The fact he's only had time to attend one match proves how busy he is and its certainly not because he's holding some garden party or a parade every other week.

Criticism of Elizabeth Windsor and her family does not by any means make you anti-royalist.

So what should an 86 year old be doing?