You can imagine Dean in the VAR room as the ball went in, pulling all the live feeds from the cameras..
Sorry No cameras
Told the lineman to stick his flag up
You can imagine Dean in the VAR room as the ball went in, pulling all the live feeds from the cameras..
Sorry No cameras
Have Wolves got screens ? unless they’ve had them installed in the last couple of seasons - my son was a season ticket holder and a lot of their fans used to complain about the lack of screens
Plus, as a result of being offisde in the first, he was in a more advantageous position post-skimmed header, than he would have been if he had been onside.
So it's f*ckingwell offside.
So salah could of been on the goal line and be onside because if skimmed the wolves player head!? Ridiculous decision and roles reversed that goal by salah would of been disallowed
He has actually mastered it he looks & sounds like the epitome of a bin dipperI wish Danny Murphy would iron his colours on those Next long sleeve tops he wears better, looks more of of a scruff than he probably is!!
I reckon if the lino has seen him as offside then it is because he has used the coming-back-from-an-offside-position excuse which seems to be a catch-all reasoning they use whenever they are not sure. It is often followed by “and they never got themselves back onside” even when they appear level with the last defender. They say if a player is running from an offside position to pick up the ball in an onside position that this is classed as offside but what else can a corner-taker do, they have to be furthest forward in any case, it’s a stupid rule. It needs changing so that individual player can avoid this shite reasoning.Arguably looks off from that, if it was a wolves player with the first header. However, applying the Salah rule (from earlier this very same match) - the second wolves header surely means the wolves corner taker is then onside just like Salad was.
I reckon either Salah’s goal must be ruled out, or that one must be allowed. It’s getting confusing now. The rules should be simpler than this in the implementation.
Hmm... The subjectivity is in whether it was a deliberate play and if he was in control. Give Dean some subjective choice and he will go with the wrong one. But you are right. The rule is stupid.I don’t know if it’s been mentioned, but silva benefitted against Villa on a similar one with Mings mid controlling a ball.
I am afraid that one is not on VAR/ Madley/ Liverpool or Salah but the rules of the game.
I’m pretty sure the same fans who think it is wrong now, where ok when Silva scored and the Liverpool fans who where complaining that Silva was offside are ok now.
It’s a problem throughout football, where for me the rule is wrong (and for the record, I didn’t care when Silva scored against the stubborn A Villa defence, so I’m the same as everyone.
The second one is just so wrong, the idea of VAR is that we are not going off the line persons decision it gets checked.
VAR takes a lot of enjoyment from the game, but now to have areas where they say they cannot use it is a farce.
2 clubs benefitted from VAR/ dodgy decisions and the 2 the TV companies still want in the competition.
2 where right but harsh (Salah/ Everton offside) and 2 where laughable United’s pen and Wolves offside.
Expect nothing to change
Erm … yeah!I am a supporter of VAR, but only if it is used properly by fair minded and competent officials.