FA Cup 3rd Round Games 6/7/8/9 Jan

  • Thread starter Deleted member 81382
  • Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Have Wolves got screens ? unless they’ve had them installed in the last couple of seasons - my son was a season ticket holder and a lot of their fans used to complain about the lack of screens

They have all the camera for all angles but the scousers don’t wonder why
 
Plus, as a result of being offisde in the first, he was in a more advantageous position post-skimmed header, than he would have been if he had been onside.
So it's f*ckingwell offside.

So salah could of been on the goal line and be onside because if skimmed the wolves player head!? Ridiculous decision and roles reversed that goal by salah would of been disallowed
 
So salah could of been on the goal line and be onside because if skimmed the wolves player head!? Ridiculous decision and roles reversed that goal by salah would of been disallowed

It's absolutely ridiculous. The whole point of off-side was to stop goal-hanging over a hundred years ago. Absolutely clear. Sure some mistakes were made, but at least you know they were just stupid mistakes.

Now, you are allowing "goal-hanging" because of some dumb rules for what purpose exactly? And it is now more subjective because you are letting Dean decide things like: deliberate play? did he touch it? header? off the ground? Mike fucking Dean. Known for making strange decisions as a referee.
 
I am a supporter of VAR, but only if it is used properly by fair minded and competent officials. It would seem though that we have at least two instances where there is a difference in how the technology is implemented at Liverpool and Salford. How can that be? It just blows my mind that this is allowed without question or challenge from the other clubs. Who sanctions that this is ok? The PL? PIGMOL?
The disallowed goal for Wolves was the most blatant piece of match manipulation I have seen. Wolves score, Referee looks to his right and raises his arm for a moment. Linesman raises the offside flag, Goal disallowed as there is 'no evidence' to over rule the linesmans flag. At least 10 minutes later an explanation that the corner kick taker was offside but no pictures to show that he was. That is just so fucking wrong.
 
I don’t know if it’s been mentioned, but silva benefitted against Villa on a similar one with Mings mid controlling a ball.

I am afraid that one is not on VAR/ Madley/ Liverpool or Salah but the rules of the game.

I’m pretty sure the same fans who think it is wrong now, where ok when Silva scored and the Liverpool fans who where complaining that Silva was offside are ok now.

It’s a problem throughout football, where for me the rule is wrong (and for the record, I didn’t care when Silva scored against the stubborn A Villa defence, so I’m the same as everyone.

The second one is just so wrong, the idea of VAR is that we are not going off the line persons decision it gets checked.

VAR takes a lot of enjoyment from the game, but now to have areas where they say they cannot use it is a farce.

2 clubs benefitted from VAR/ dodgy decisions and the 2 the TV companies still want in the competition.

2 where right but harsh (Salah/ Everton offside) and 2 where laughable United’s pen and Wolves offside.

Expect nothing to change
 
Arguably looks off from that, if it was a wolves player with the first header. However, applying the Salah rule (from earlier this very same match) - the second wolves header surely means the wolves corner taker is then onside just like Salad was.

I reckon either Salah’s goal must be ruled out, or that one must be allowed. It’s getting confusing now. The rules should be simpler than this in the implementation.
I reckon if the lino has seen him as offside then it is because he has used the coming-back-from-an-offside-position excuse which seems to be a catch-all reasoning they use whenever they are not sure. It is often followed by “and they never got themselves back onside” even when they appear level with the last defender. They say if a player is running from an offside position to pick up the ball in an onside position that this is classed as offside but what else can a corner-taker do, they have to be furthest forward in any case, it’s a stupid rule. It needs changing so that individual player can avoid this shite reasoning.
 
I don’t know if it’s been mentioned, but silva benefitted against Villa on a similar one with Mings mid controlling a ball.

I am afraid that one is not on VAR/ Madley/ Liverpool or Salah but the rules of the game.

I’m pretty sure the same fans who think it is wrong now, where ok when Silva scored and the Liverpool fans who where complaining that Silva was offside are ok now.

It’s a problem throughout football, where for me the rule is wrong (and for the record, I didn’t care when Silva scored against the stubborn A Villa defence, so I’m the same as everyone.

The second one is just so wrong, the idea of VAR is that we are not going off the line persons decision it gets checked.

VAR takes a lot of enjoyment from the game, but now to have areas where they say they cannot use it is a farce.

2 clubs benefitted from VAR/ dodgy decisions and the 2 the TV companies still want in the competition.

2 where right but harsh (Salah/ Everton offside) and 2 where laughable United’s pen and Wolves offside.

Expect nothing to change
Hmm... The subjectivity is in whether it was a deliberate play and if he was in control. Give Dean some subjective choice and he will go with the wrong one. But you are right. The rule is stupid.

The rule was changed wasn't it after the Bernardo goal? Not just making a deliberate play, but having to be in control? Or was it not coming back from off-side? Who the fuck knows? All too complicated.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.