xgorton
Well-Known Member
I mentioned it in off topic but I think it deserves also on here,first 2 episodes tonight of EARLY DOORS on BBC 4 at 10-55.
There are camera angles. Lots of themWolves were absolutley robbed , the Salah goal is simply offside irrespective of the Wolves player touching the ball , when the ball was crossed Salah was yards offside , and the fact they cannot find a camera angle for the 2nd dubious decision is a load of bollocks , they have the angle but it doesnt suit the F.A. for the holders and a big name to go out in the 3rd round.
Decisions like this only prove how the Premier league and F.A, are quite willing to bend the rules for the red 'istree clubs , it f*cking stinks and happens on a weekly basis , its about time referee's served long term bans for performances like tonight he gave the Dippers everything .Really hope justice is done and Wolves smash them a Molyneux , but they will have to beat PGMOL ,F.A. and even the Premier league to do so , just like we have for the last dozen years.
It's like the women at the stoning in Life of Brian.I don’t think I’ve ever heard any officials decision supported with ‘he’s very experienced’ and yet I’ve heard it 3 times now, all I connection with this game. It’s all a bit weird.
Very experienced thoLinesman is a yard behind the red line in the picture.
They might but it’s 90 more minutes for the German Bitch-Machine to moan endlessly about FAC replays, which is delightful enough regardless.Liverpool will probably scud them 4-0 in the replay.
As I said the Irish butt plug did eulogise over a shinner lol
Oooh, definitely. Very, very experienced guy him. In fact, he's the best, most very experienced linesman ever.Very experienced tho
And a beautiful, beautiful, beautiful linesman.Oooh, definitely. Very, very experienced guy him. In fact, he's the best, most very experienced linesman ever.
![]()
That line is too wide!!There are camera angles. Lots of them
That could be the head of an incredibly tall person in the crowd, who happens to be wearing yellow. VAR needs better evidence than that to overturn the judgement of a very, very experienced linesman.There are camera angles. Lots of them
I believe this to be true.Do people still wonder why they don't have video screens at Anfield and the swamp...?
That linesman is bent as a nine-bob note.
See this is what I don’t understand and haven’t heard the question asked. Why is there no camera angle? Is VAR implemented differently at Anfield and if so why? Surely to god every PL ground has to have a consistent implementation or teams are playing to different rules.This argument could be used all the time. There may be no camera angle showing offside because it was not offside.
If it's not offside then a camera angle showing offside will not exist, irrespective of how many cameras there are.
Just look at Trents position, and Nunes position when he comes in frame 0.1 seconds later. No chance he was offside, Wolves got robbed by liVARpool as so many teams have been before. Absolute joke.
Eh, he’s 5 yards onside. Doesnt matter how thick the line is. It matters how thick/bent the officials areThat line is too wide!!
;)That could be the head of an incredibly tall person in the crowd, who happens to be wearing yellow. VAR needs better evidence than that to overturn the judgement of a very, very experienced linesman.
Yes unfortunately there was no angle available for VAR to get him sent off.He is looking down at Traore as he stamps on his face , what a f*cking coward