FA Cup 3rd Round Games 6/7/8/9 Jan

  • Thread starter Deleted member 81382
  • Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Bluearmy said:
There are camera angles. Lots of them
Click to expand...
That could be the head of an incredibly tall person in the crowd, who happens to be wearing yellow. VAR needs better evidence than that to overturn the judgement of a very, very experienced linesman.
 
Lavinda Past said:
Do people still wonder why they don't have video screens at Anfield and the swamp...?

That linesman is bent as a nine-bob note.
Click to expand...
I believe this to be true.

They can build a new fuckin stand at Anfield around the existing one yet cant put a screen or cameras in!

Fuckin cunts, cheats to the core.

Once a Scouser!

You can take the the Scouser out of Liverpool etc etc (generally when they've made a few quid legitimately or more likely illegally)
 
Tommy_Catons_Perm said:
This argument could be used all the time. There may be no camera angle showing offside because it was not offside.

If it's not offside then a camera angle showing offside will not exist, irrespective of how many cameras there are.
Click to expand...
See this is what I don’t understand and haven’t heard the question asked. Why is there no camera angle? Is VAR implemented differently at Anfield and if so why? Surely to god every PL ground has to have a consistent implementation or teams are playing to different rules.
 
Vester said:


Just look at Trents position, and Nunes position when he comes in frame 0.1 seconds later. No chance he was offside, Wolves got robbed by liVARpool as so many teams have been before. Absolute joke.
Click to expand...

This is the very first frame that shows the very top blur of the head of the corner taker (bottom red circle).

I have drawn a crude offside line (that probably favours Liverpool more than anything).

The ball is difficult to see but is in the center of the centre red circle (it is just leaving the body of a player). It is still unknown if it came off a Liverpool or a Wolves player (as we saw with the Salah goal, it is apparently impossible for the corner taker to be offside if a Liverpool player was the last to touch the ball).

Either way, it is very difficult to believe that the corner taker was offside when the ball was cleared to them.

EE8-EEE3-E-32-F8-4-A31-B08-A-CFF0-B0-CD353-C.jpg


Here are the problems with this decision and VAR:

1) because the officials are not mic’d, there is no way to know if the flag was for the corner taker or some other fabricated infringement

2) there is a bling spot for VAR at Anfield (for “reasons”) that prevented any conclusive frame from being capture that would show the exact position of the corner taker when the ball was played

3) VAR provided no evidence of who last touch the ball, which would determine if the corner taker could be offside at all

4) the linesman flagged for offside in this instance, whilst the other linesman didn’t flag for offside for the Salah goal; these decisions substantive impacted the outcome of the goals (no flag for the Wolves goal and it would have stood; a flag for the Salah goal and it wouldn’t have stood).
There are serious issues with the current officiating and VAR (especially at certain grounds like Anfield).
 
Salah was offside
Wolves winner wasn’t offside
Robertson deliberate stamp in face

All went dippers way as ever. Robertson stamp was 100 times worse than the one of Ballotelli v Spurs. Mario subsequently got a 3 match ban, Robertson incident will just be ignored, it will never have happened
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.