Franny 1234
Well-Known Member
Would of preferred a northern away tie. So my grandson gets to see more grounds.But can't complain a home tie against a side we're more than capable of beating Hopefully Wembley here we come. CTID
Burnley will sell 6000 easily and it will be lively before and after in town .
If they’re on Gill’s dime it certainly doesWondering if who tosses the coin has a bearing on the outcome ???
Crooked reasonsAlso, I was trying not to get in to this because a few are already having a go at me for making pretty basic statistical factual points about the discussion, but ‘flipping a coin’ is absolutely not an equivalent to the cup draw process.
The discrete event probabilities in each are quite different and the Cup draw’s aggregate expected value probabilities are substantially more complex than simply flipping a coin hundreds of times.
To be clear, the cup draw process is not ‘random’. No statistician worth their salt if asked to create a ‘random’ number selection process would ever choose to have people affiliated with the organisation running the selection using their hands to draw balls out of a bowl on international television.
In fact, they should at least be using ‘no human interaction’ lottery standards, but they chose not to for… reasons.
Wasn't the UAE trip a few days before we lost at home to Middlesbrough in the cup? Think it was the year after we lost to Uwe's Wigan.The team were forced to do a promo tour of UAE before the Wigan game, and it backfired.
That's not the argument though is it? It's Scum getting 10 home draws in a row vs. not. If you roll a die 10 times and get 10 sixes, the odds of getting a six next time are theoretically still 1 in 6 - but only if the die is fair. Getting 10 in a row is clearly possible (1/1024 as was stated earlier) but every additional 6 raises the odds of the die being biased.OK, then you go and you need to hit red, red, black, black, red, red red, black, red, black in that order, who has the better odds of winning?
Appearance of randomness with ex-United players picking balls out of a glass bowl ...Yes, the physical act is not ‘random’.
The concept (like most specific concepts of randomness) could be considered ‘random’, even if it is exceedingly difficult to actual create such a random system.
If anyone is interested in a deep dive (I am sure @dronefromsector7G and @Gray would love to read about this subject), this is a great primer on the problem with randomness (and how we perceive it, very often inaccurately).
The Crucial Thing a Computer Can’t Do
In order to produce true randomness, computers must reach outside themselves.slate.com
To be clear, if you wanted to create a selection system that was easily influenced, but still maintained the appearance of randomness, you wouldn’t be far off with a process that involves people affiliated with an organisation pulling balls out of a bowl on television.
As already stated can only possibly be on the Saturday only question is what timeNot if the buggers stick on TV at 8pm Monday night.
Didn’t we arrive back just the day before and Pellers turned up in a hoodie and jeans?