Thenumber1blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Apr 2009
- Messages
- 5,904
What exactly has Sagna done wrong,looked solid when he came in. Another sheep effect.
What exactly has Sagna done wrong,looked solid when he came in. Another sheep effect.
If I remember correctly, Sagna is on 150k a week. Either from Mirror or Daily Mail.
He defends badly, he attacks badly. He hampers us.What exactly has Sagna done wrong,looked solid when he came in. Another sheep effect.
Looked better defensively than Zabaleta to me whenever he was allowed a game last season. People make opinions and then only see what backs up those opinions. Which is why Zabaleta can do no wrong, but Navas, Fernando and Sagna apparently did nothing right all yearHe defends badly, he attacks badly. He hampers us.
IMO we can't be spending 100m on star players and not have 4 excellent fullbacks. Zabaletta and Clichy are solid. Sagna and Kolorov are not.
I don't get why so many others can't see that FB is a priority to strengthen.
Can't agree Mate, it isn't gonna happen, because of the bloody ridiculous HG rule, but I'd much rather see Clichy leave than Kolorov.He defends badly, he attacks badly. He hampers us.
IMO we can't be spending 100m on star players and not have 4 excellent fullbacks. Zabaletta and Clichy are solid. Sagna and Kolorov are not.
I don't get why so many others can't see that FB is a priority to strengthen.
He's pitifully slow, struggles to keep up with play & is a terrible crosser of the ball... Other than that, he's not bad.What exactly has Sagna done wrong,looked solid when he came in. Another sheep effect.
Just can't see it. Sorry.
To me Kolorov has a fantastic cross but can't link the attack so it's been proved useless time and again.
Sagna might just suffer from being in a new club but he too can't link with anyone else and to make matters worse he has no confidence.
Both have a had a few decent matches but surely we should expect much much better.