Can't be that good if Real Madrid sold him.
Not good enough for Real so he's not good enough for City.
Great logic there
Can't be that good if Real Madrid sold him.
Not good enough for Real so he's not good enough for City.
Can't be that good if Real Madrid sold him.
Not good enough for Real so he's not good enough for City.
Is he any good? I've never seen him play.
Good afternoon, Txiki.
I do love when people come out with this bullshit line, made all the better this time by the fact that Madrid didn't sell him, as they never owned him. He was on loan to their B team for a year when he was 19.Can't be that good if Real Madrid sold him.
Not good enough for Real so he's not good enough for City.
They didn't sell him as they never owned him.Can't be that good if Real Madrid sold him.
Not good enough for Real so he's not good enough for City.
Brazilians offer futile defence on the hole.
Can't be that good if Real Madrid sold him.
Not good enough for Real so he's not good enough for City.
Eto'o, Sneijder, Robben, Negredo, Mata, Morata, Makelele and Cambiasso beg to differ.Can't be that good if Real Madrid sold him.
Not good enough for Real so he's not good enough for City.
Not having that. By your reasoning:
KdB - Not good enough for Chelski, so he's not good enough for City
I don't think so.
Because Real sold him he is bad,really Real also sold Robben,Ozil;Di Maria are they bad??
Kinkladzinho would've been the best.We ought to have 'inho' on the back of every shirt - Kompaninho, Silvinho (oh, we've already had that one!) Hartinho, even the Argentinians - Zabaletinho, Aguerinho, and Tourinho sounds like a decent team to me. Sterlinho, Pogbinho, de Bruyninho would be more than welcome.
So... Who is this ****