FC United Thread

We should wait until the Freedom of Information Request has been replied to.
Then the hard facts of how much and timescales set can be assessed and further questions then can be worked out.

Yes, I agree. I'll carry on doing some research in the background, but it makes sense to await the result of the FoI request before looking at where we go next.
 
Enough is Enough.. It is only going to end badly for Manchester City Council and will end up costing more money to put Boardhusrt field back to green fields, I heard something that the land has to be put back to green fields if FUCM folded
 
Enough is Enough.. It is only going to end badly for Manchester City Council and will end up costing more money to put Boardhusrt field back to green fields, I heard something that the land has to be put back to green fields if FUCM folded
I'm sure for the right sort of money that the restrictive covenants on the land on which Pallet park stands could be navigated.
 
We should wait until the Freedom of Information Request has been replied to.
Then the hard facts of how much and timescales set can be assessed and further questions then can be worked out.
Do Private Eye still have their Rotten Borough feature?

I’m surprised a journalist who specialises in reporting on clubs being mismanaged hasn’t covered this, someone like the renowned journo David Conn for example….
As my mother would say 'you've more chance of seeing Moses having a paddle in the Mersey' than hearing a peep out of Conn on this matter now!
 
Enough is Enough.. It is only going to end badly for Manchester City Council and will end up costing more money to put Boardhusrt field back to green fields, I heard something that the land has to be put back to green fields if FUCM folded
The opposite.
FCUM have it in their manifesto / constitution (or whatever it is called) that if / when they go tits up, the land has to remain a sporting facility that benefits the local community - which is ironic seeing as it has rarely done that in the years it has been standing. *
 
The opposite.
FCUM have it in their manifesto / constitution (or whatever it is called) that if / when they go tits up, the land has to remain a sporting facility that benefits the local community - which is ironic seeing as it has rarely done that in the years it has been standing. *

What other sporting facility other than rugby or another football club would benefit from using it

Maybe City fans could form a breakaway club and call it the 115 Mancheaters
 
We should wait until the Freedom of Information Request has been replied to.
Then the hard facts of how much and timescales set can be assessed and further questions then can be worked out.
Do Private Eye still have their Rotten Borough feature?

I’m surprised a journalist who specialises in reporting on clubs being mismanaged hasn’t covered this, someone like the renowned journo David Conn for example….
A huge chance for David Conn to admit he has got things badly wrong with FCUM.
I'm amazed how they got away with the previous mismanagement of funds under their old regime ?
Surely Manchester City Council and the media should have leapt on this corruption...
 
Reading this really makes me want to question who and why at MCC have ploughed so much money into this doomed vanity project!!
 

Attachments

  • 1000002661.jpg
    1000002661.jpg
    609.4 KB · Views: 37
Reading this really makes me want to question who and why at MCC have ploughed so much money into this doomed vanity project!!
Astonishing to think that from that £50m shortfall, the money they’ve dished out to these turncoats comes to 3.84% of it.

Someone a few pages back said that Soccer Club United Manchester have had £1,918,855.85 off MCC.

Manchester City Council; STOP GIVING THESE FUCKERS MONEY!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.