Fergie (merged)

Re: Fergie

waspish said:
hertsblue said:
Sky were also banned from Ferguson's weekly Friday media briefing, although were allowed back in last week having served their time, for their perceived excessive coverage of the United manager's Boxing Day touchline spat with referee Mike Dean.

Why dont these media groups just grow a pair and say right if we are banned there will be zero press from us on Utd. Lets see how long before Sky dont show thier games, BBC refuse to show highlights and the media printing stories from Utd before someone at utd gets panicky about the lack of coverage to "thier billions" of fans worldwide.
If thats correct with Sky then why were the big hitters in charge of Sky not reminding Utd who pays for the TV money they receive instead of bending over.

Its the same as the BBC. When he refused to talk to them for years, personally i would have pulled them from MOTD as they broke the contract. Instead you had BBC giving FA cup fixtures live to Utd.

All it takes is 1 media establishment to stand up to him and Utd and the rest will follow but none of them it seems have any backbone or balls. I understand that the majority of armchair fans follow Utd and it may hurt them a little but my god, what are the people in charge of these companies doing in letting Utd get away with it, its no way to run a business.

Well sky have grown a pair they bought scum tv


They only ever had a one third minority share which they've just sold. The rags now have 100% ownership of MUTV so Sky can let rip. If they could only grow a pair.
 
Re: Fergie

Isn't it strange how News International journalists didn't hack baconface's voice mail, like they did to virtually everyone else in the country. I bet they did but didn't want to damage their readership figures, or Sky's subscriptions by printing juicy stories about the evil one.

Now I think about it, I don't think anyone in football was hacked. NI obviously not wanting to bite the hand that feeds it.
 
Re: Fergie

Fergie is out of control and this coupled with his bad/selective memory.
Re his comments about the Kompany appeal and it setting a dangerous precedent.
3 years ago, Ferdinand punches a Hull City player, is not sent off but caught on camera and is given a 3 match ban.....however with United having some defenders injured and the league cup semi approaching, Fergie appeals the ban knowing he can't win and takes the hit....however the appeal means the start of the ban is delayed and allows Ferdinand to play against City......talk about corrupt !!!
 
Re: Fergie

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/horse-racing/21148447" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/horse-racing/21148447</a>
 
Re: Fergie

I am slowly coming to the conclusion that the piss artist formerly known as fergusson os going to lose the scum the title this year. the tide is turning... slowly but it is begining to turn.
 
Re: Fergie

Bloody hell, all these paranoid managers in on the agenda! That must be 6 or 7 this season now who have all said the same thing in their own way.

[bigimg]http://oi49.tinypic.com/2dcakq0.jpg[/bigimg]
 
Re: Fergie

Huge own goal from Ferguson

Now every man Utd game the refs almost have to prove that they are not under Ferguson's thumb. Ferguson's pressure tactics on the refs is now big news

And it will get bigger if he's charged by the FA. Surely they have to do that. I'm not even sure why they have asked him for his comments. He made himself quite clear. It was hardly in the category of manicni's christmas dinner joke
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.