dan.j.mcfc said:LHarper said:dan.j.mcfc said:Who would you rather have attacking Yaya with Fernandinho covering or Fernandinho with Yaya covering? I know which I would chose. I accept he his a good dribbler but like I said previously we don't need him to attack we're more than covered in that department, I wouldn't at all be upset if he was used in a similar role to how Busquets is for Barca.
So you don't need Fernandinho to attack because we are covered in that department but you would have Yaya attack? What's the difference?
I don't think we'll see one exclusively hold and one attack but rather a balance between the two once they get used to playing together.
In my opinion, Fernandinho will be a lot better at the pressing game than Yaya, who would more likely sweep behind the front 5.
I disagree completely, I wasn't saying neither of them should attack I was responding to the claim that he was signed because he's such a good dribbler, of course you expect attacking input from midfield and that should come from Yaya IMO. Did Yaya and Barry alternate? Not really and look at our defensive record as a whole over the last few years.
We will be wide open without having a genuine DM playing, in the holding role like Barry. If we deploy both as box to box style midfielders, I genuinely worry about Yaya covering/getting back and with Fernandinho playing a more attacking game as you suggest. I really think we would struggle.
I believe he was signed as a box-to-box midfielder who could either sit deep and play like a 'regista' or further forward if needed.
Barry and Fernandinho are quite different so that is why Yaya was the main attacker in that duo. With Fernandinho beside him I think Yaya will be much more defensive than previously and will be the 'regista' in most games.
Yaya can be really lazy with tracking back and covering after joining in the attack in the final third so I would prefer him to be given that holding role next season.