Fernando Torres [Merged]

Status
Not open for further replies.
warhawkmoski said:
Paulmcfc2703 said:

Be careful agreeing with me over Pam, you may get her little puppy SWP's back coming after you. It's kind of funny, either Pam has two accounts that she uses to back-up her own comments and make it look like she has support, or she is holding SWP's back's leash and pulling him around into all of her conversations on here.


Shame you aren't in the Uk and you could check I am genuine in person. Pam will happily tell you no doubt that I do not fawn to her by any strech. I am usually trying to take the piss out of her hatred for the rags.

Maybe I just hate thick yanks that try and tell English people that their words (such as "spelt"), do not exist. A yank lecturing on spelling, you will be trying to tell us off for "friendly fire" next. Or having a go at a British company for causing an oil spill. Even though the spill was caused at a US installation, manned by US workers and run by two US companies.

Warhawk? What a name. Grow up and go watch rounders whilst hoisting a flag and thanking god that you live a country whereby anyone can rise to be President (especially if their father and/or husband used to be one).

Oh and woof woof.
 
sniff said:
some "respected ITK's" are up for the list then.

No doubt the deal was nailed on until news of their new owner came out yesterday, they will find a way of worming out of it!
 
like i said earlier..

i hope someone bans 80s short's
my friend who lives in city told me that if torres was to leave liverpool it was for chelsea not city.
 
arabmoney said:
like i said earlier..

i hope someone bans 80s short's
my friend who lives in city told me that if torres was to leave liverpool it was for chelsea not city.

well dont be silly now, i think all but one suggested that a Torres deal was close or done. we would have no one left.
 
Bottom line its not up to Torres if he stays or goes! if the banks want there money Hicks and Gillet will have to sell
 
sniff said:
arabmoney said:
like i said earlier..

i hope someone bans 80s short's
my friend who lives in city told me that if torres was to leave liverpool it was for chelsea not city.

well dont be silly now, i think all but one suggested that a Torres deal was close or done. we would have no one left.

mancini is after balotelli just beacause he knew that torres deal would fail.

target 1 & 2 was dzeko and torres.
it didn't happen and now balo is on his way<br /><br />-- Tue Aug 03, 2010 2:29 pm --<br /><br />
waspish said:
Bottom line its not up to Torres if he stays or goes! if the banks want there money Hicks and Gillet will have to sell

they will have new owners so they don't have to sell torres
 
SWP's back said:
warhawkmoski said:
Be careful agreeing with me over Pam, you may get her little puppy SWP's back coming after you. It's kind of funny, either Pam has two accounts that she uses to back-up her own comments and make it look like she has support, or she is holding SWP's back's leash and pulling him around into all of her conversations on here.


Shame you aren't in the Uk and you could check I am genuine in person. Pam will happily tell you no doubt that I do not fawn to her by any strech. I am usually trying to take the piss out of her hatred for the rags.

Maybe I just hate thick yanks that try and tell English people that their words (such as "spelt"), do not exist. A yank lecturing on spelling, you will be trying to tell us off for "friendly fire" next. Or having a go at a British company for causing an oil spill. Even though the spill was caused at a. US installation, manned by US workers and run by two US companies.

Warhawk? What a name. Grow up and go watch rounders whilst hoisting a flag and thanking god that you live a country whereby anyone can rise to be President (especially if their father and/or husband used to be one).

Oh and woof woof.


First off, that is such a pathetic excuse for a post I won't even comment on it. But the fact that you continue to stick your nose in something that has nothing to do with you explains a lot about your character. As for my ID onhere, how dare you comment onit the way you did, you have no idea why I chose it or what it means. And you know nothing about me, but make huge generalizations about me and all Americans, which is unbelievably pathetic and further explains more about your character. Because of your complete ignorance and lack of positive contribution on this board you are joining your friend Pam on the ignore list.

Good day and Good by
 
warhawkmoski said:
SWP's back said:
Shame you aren't in the Uk and you could check I am genuine in person. Pam will happily tell you no doubt that I do not fawn to her by any strech. I am usually trying to take the piss out of her hatred for the rags.

Maybe I just hate thick yanks that try and tell English people that their words (such as "spelt"), do not exist. A yank lecturing on spelling, you will be trying to tell us off for "friendly fire" next. Or having a go at a British company for causing an oil spill. Even though the spill was caused at a. US installation, manned by US workers and run by two US companies.

Warhawk? What a name. Grow up and go watch rounders whilst hoisting a flag and thanking god that you live a country whereby anyone can rise to be President (especially if their father and/or husband used to be one).

Oh and woof woof.


First off, that is such a pathetic excuse for a post I won't even comment on it. But the fact that you continue to stick your nose in something that has nothing to do with you explains a lot about your character. As for my ID onhere, how dare you comment onit the way you did, you have no idea why I chose it or what it means. And you know nothing about me, but make huge generalizations about me and all Americans, which is unbelievably pathetic and further explains more about your character. Because of your complete ignorance and lack of positive contribution on this board you are joining your friend Pam on the ignore list.

Good day and Good by

Lack of positive contribution? Ha. Such as pulling people up on spelling? Very ironic.

You had a silly spat with Pam on a public forum, Pam "owned" you and I said so. Not realy sticking my nose in is it. You were the first to make anything personal, labelling me her lap dog and saying I was her 2nd log in. If you can't take flak, don't take it.

You are right though, I know nothing about you and I am pleased enough for that.

ps - Good bye has an "e" on the end. Someone so desperate for fellow posters to have accurate spelling must surely know that.
 
SWP's back said:
warhawkmoski said:
First off, that is such a pathetic excuse for a post I won't even comment on it. But the fact that you continue to stick your nose in something that has nothing to do with you explains a lot about your character. As for my ID onhere, how dare you comment onit the way you did, you have no idea why I chose it or what it means. And you know nothing about me, but make huge generalizations about me and all Americans, which is unbelievably pathetic and further explains more about your character. Because of your complete ignorance and lack of positive contribution on this board you are joining your friend Pam on the ignore list.

Good day and Good by

Lack of positive contribution? Ha. Such as pulling people up on spelling? Very ironic.

You had a silly spat with Pam on a public forum, Pam "owned" you and I said so. Not realy sticking my nose in is it. You were the first to make anything personal, labelling me her lap dog and saying I was her 2nd log in. If you can't take flak, don't take it.

You are right though, I know nothing about you and I am pleased enough for that.

ps - Good bye has an "e" on the end. Someone so desperate for fellow posters to have accurate spelling must surely know that.

well i for one think poor grammar is an affliction this board can do without.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.