Petetheblu
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Sep 2007
- Messages
- 7,325
City and Chelsea should get together and agree not to pay more than 40 million for him, hicks and gilette are being to greedy.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Fernando Torres Update
- Thread starter JoeMercer'sWay
- Start date
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
Ajay said:Total and utter BS!
We would not pay him that kind of money - he has been given a very good offer that will make him the highest paid premiership player but the package is not as straight forward as 200k a week!
I trust you implicitly on being able to spot "total and utter bullshit" a mile off Ajay.
spacecadet
Well-Known Member
Stay where he is? Champions League- not at Liverpool- Maybe doubling his salary at City is more appealing than staying at a failing club in Liverpool?
cucumberman
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 5,082
they are currently a failing club, but liverpool is more realistically bought than rags.
i believe him staying all depends on a slim chance of them being bought.
if they are bought, and the new owner suddenly wants to invest in silva and the likes, might be tempting for torres to stay.
which is why i believe if we want to drag torres here, we are working on a very short window and we should definitely be on a take it or leave it stance.
i believe him staying all depends on a slim chance of them being bought.
if they are bought, and the new owner suddenly wants to invest in silva and the likes, might be tempting for torres to stay.
which is why i believe if we want to drag torres here, we are working on a very short window and we should definitely be on a take it or leave it stance.
Jim Tolmie's Underpants
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Jun 2007
- Messages
- 4,392
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/3007255/City-back-on-Torres-trail.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... trail.html</a>
simon23
Well-Known Member
one of the best strikers in the world on his day...would love to have him
only worries are his injury issues (i can see him turning into another Owen).
there arent too many clubs that could afford him
IF chelski want him surely he would go there?....
only worries are his injury issues (i can see him turning into another Owen).
there arent too many clubs that could afford him
IF chelski want him surely he would go there?....
Ticket For Schalke
Well-Known Member
If City do mount a serious bid next month they are likely to face competition from Chelsea, who are ready to smash the British transfer record to sign him.
why would it take us to bid to make chelsea bid. Shite.<br /><br />-- Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:54 am --<br /><br />
If City do mount a serious bid next month they are likely to face competition from Chelsea, who are ready to smash the British transfer record to sign him.
why would it take us to bid to make chelsea bid. Shite.
Ticket For Schalke
Well-Known Member
Juventino said:David Villa has just gone for 35 Million I'd pay no more than 40 for Torres.
Again valencia needed to sell, liverpool dont.
Ticket For Schalke said:Juventino said:David Villa has just gone for 35 Million I'd pay no more than 40 for Torres.
Again valencia needed to sell, liverpool dont.
Thats true, however Valencia have alot of fringe players they could of sold that would of collected close to 30 million. I'd go for Dzeko over Torres personally. I don't see whats wrong with Tevez and Adebayor give them a full season together and I'm sure they'll cope well enough. You're best signing somebody cheaper to be a backup player.