Kinkys Left Foot
Well-Known Member
Ive seen "Breaking Glass" if that helps and that was quite good Hazel was good in it....
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Football Leaks/Der Spiegel articles
- Thread starter BlueDejong
- Start date
Ive seen "Breaking Glass" if that helps and that was quite good Hazel was good in it....
richards30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2009
- Messages
- 27,841
He wasn’t the guy that broke the city stories though was he? Still helps with the credibility argument in court though I guess if/when that happens!
MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
He wasn’t the guy that broke the city stories though was he? Still helps with the credibility argument in court though I guess if/when that happens!
I don't think it affects the FFP thing one bit.
Only if City claim the emails are made up (as opposed to taken out of context) will this become even marginally relevant, and even then, it isn't.
goat boy
Well-Known Member
Has someone thrown a punch back here, or what?
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,165
I don't think it affects the FFP thing one bit.
Only if City claim the emails are made up (as opposed to taken out of context) will this become even marginally relevant, and even then, it isn't.
The emails are stolen, the newspaper believes they are true but has a history of being duped over a long period of time. It shows that they may have questionable morals & fail due diligence & theyre ****s. A top barrister should be able to rip it to shreds.
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
As cheekybids has pointed out, it raises doubts about the quality of their due diligence. Considering the 'evidence' is questionable to begin with...I don't think it affects the FFP thing one bit.
Only if City claim the emails are made up (as opposed to taken out of context) will this become even marginally relevant, and even then, it isn't.
MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
Whether they're admissible and the weight given to them depends on UEFA regs; it's not a trial.
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
Yet UEFA know anything they do in regards to sanctions, they potentially have to justify to both CAS and the courts. As Milan have shown. Banning a club on the grounds of questionable hearsay would not go down well with either body.Whether they're admissible and the weight given to them depends on UEFA regs; it's not a trial.
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,165
Whether they're admissible and the weight given to them depends on UEFA regs; it's not a trial.
If they use it to ban City then you can be sure that there would be a trial.
MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
If they use it to ban City then you can be sure that there would be a trial.
and @aguero93:20
Absolutely, but the last one didn't go that far, and I don't think this will either.
City will certainly question the source of the email, and I expect they would at least raise the spectre of what may occur, but I think it will be resolved well before things get heavy. I'm not suggesting that the dubious acquisition method does anything but weaken any case against City.