For or against flares/smoke bombs?

[Wrighty Wrexham]

I despair!!!!!

 

[Nelly's Left Foot]

100% against both but not surprising so many seem to be for them. Jail time for anyone taking them in and banned for life from City.

 

[lankyblue]

100% against both but not surprising so many seem to be for them. Jail time for anyone taking them in and banned for life from City.

Agree !! Pity there are so many who think it is OK.<br /><br />-- Tue Dec 03, 2013 2:18 pm --<br /><br />I suppose if these fans continue to throw smoke bombs etc. and City are banned then all we need do is to come back to this topic pick them out and get them banned from any further matches.

 

[greasedupdeafguy]

No pyro no party :)

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3os6qEa3goM[/youtube]

OK, then go over there and support them and allow City fans to uphold the law.

calm down dear

 

[Academica]

flares - definitely against. Smoke bombs in a controlled manner I personally don't have a problem with, but I do when people choose to throw them often in a confined space.......

A controlled manner in a football crowd, yeah right.

 

[bluestevei]

smoke bombs no
flares no


wouldn't be able to see the way out when I leave 5 mins early

 

[cheddar404]

100% against both but not surprising so many seem to be for them. Jail time for anyone taking them in and banned for life from City.

Agree !! Pity there are so many who think it is OK.

-- Tue Dec 03, 2013 2:18 pm --

I suppose if these fans continue to throw smoke bombs etc. and City are banned then all we need do is to come back to this topic pick them out and get them banned from any further matches.

So it's a ban from attending the matches for even mentioning that you were in favour of flares and/or smoke bombs?

Give it another 10 years and we'll all have to wear hi-vis jackets and sign a disclaimer before we enter the stadium and watch the game in isolation booths where the temperature is regulated so that bacteria cannot multiply. Ear defenders will be compulsory although the ultimate irony will be that they won't be required.

For the record, flares: no, smoke-bombs: yes

 

[Nelly's Left Foot]

100% against both but not surprising so many seem to be for them. Jail time for anyone taking them in and banned for life from City.

Agree !! Pity there are so many who think it is OK.

-- Tue Dec 03, 2013 2:18 pm --

I suppose if these fans continue to throw smoke bombs etc. and City are banned then all we need do is to come back to this topic pick them out and get them banned from any further matches.

So it's a ban from attending the matches for even mentioning that you were in favour of flares and/or smoke bombs?

Give it another 10 years and we'll all have to wear hi-vis jackets and sign a disclaimer before we enter the stadium and watch the game in isolation booths where the temperature is regulated so that bacteria cannot multiply. Ear defenders will be compulsory although the ultimate irony will be that they won't be required.

For the record, flares: no, smoke-bombs: yes

Where exactly was the mention of a ban for mentioning anything? And your 10 years thing was sooo funny

 

[cheddar404]

Agree !! Pity there are so many who think it is OK.

-- Tue Dec 03, 2013 2:18 pm --

I suppose if these fans continue to throw smoke bombs etc. and City are banned then all we need do is to come back to this topic pick them out and get them banned from any further matches.

So it's a ban from attending the matches for even mentioning that you were in favour of flares and/or smoke bombs?

Give it another 10 years and we'll all have to wear hi-vis jackets and sign a disclaimer before we enter the stadium and watch the game in isolation booths where the temperature is regulated so that bacteria cannot multiply. Ear defenders will be compulsory although the ultimate irony will be that they won't be required.

For the record, flares: no, smoke-bombs: yes

Where exactly was the mention of a ban for mentioning anything? And your 10 years thing was sooo funny

Picking people out from this thread to get them banned. The scary thing is, I wasn't completely joking.

 

[Nelly's Left Foot]

So it's a ban from attending the matches for even mentioning that you were in favour of flares and/or smoke bombs?

Give it another 10 years and we'll all have to wear hi-vis jackets and sign a disclaimer before we enter the stadium and watch the game in isolation booths where the temperature is regulated so that bacteria cannot multiply. Ear defenders will be compulsory although the ultimate irony will be that they won't be required.

For the record, flares: no, smoke-bombs: yes

Where exactly was the mention of a ban for mentioning anything? And your 10 years thing was sooo funny

Picking people out from this thread to get them banned. The scary thing is, I wasn't completely joking.

I.E there was no mention. Thank you for clearing that up.

Anyone taking them in deserves all they get and it probably won't be enough.