Everton were informed that 6 points was the minimum sanction that could be given. Forest got 3 then 3 added on, then 2 taken off for rolling over and being a good boy for the master?
Everton got 10? 4 taken off after a costly appeal.
Forest have the hearing and punishment sorted in super quick time. Everton have no idea when they will know outcome of second charge, first charge took months.
The minimum 6 points for the charge somehow became 3 for Forest? so did Everton get the extra 3 just for being Everton?
How is any of this fair and even
I have alraedy accepted relegation ss it seems they are hell bent on finding a way to do us.
We are guilty, fair enough, but are we being treated the same as Forest here?
The 'What about City moans'. What about them? City have not been found guilty of anything. If the media are keen to keep bringing in City then surely they should be brining in Utd (claimed to be in bad debt) and Chelsea (Spend a billionon lengthy contracts) I am sure there are others.