Fulham (H) | PL | Post-Match

Grealish is rarely bad but he's not pulling up trees and that's what people are expecting. TBH, I wish he could just be quietly left to go about his business: there's too much spotlight on him individually (as there is players in general) when the collective outcome is most important. It's the world we live in though.
Hes totally doing his job in ball carrying and gaining those 20 yards and laying it off , he is very good at assisting the assister.

BUT!!! …. But there was 2 opportunities yesterday where he cut in and it slightly opened up for the shot, but he laid again. Thats where i want him stepping up.

Confidence
 
Now own up. Was anyone else thinking perfidiously, when Erling stepped up, “If he misses this, will he still be everybody's darling on here?” I actually thought KDB would take it. The foul was on him, and I just felt a bit more confident with him taking it. Was half-expecting the Viking freak to mess it up, if I'm honest. Which he nearly did. Wouldn't change a thing in my own evaluation of him, of course: a freak of nature.
 
Hes totally doing his job in ball carrying and gaining those 20 yards and laying it off , he is very good at assisting the assister.

BUT!!! …. But there was 2 opportunities yesterday where he cut in and it slightly opened up for the shot, but he laid again. Thats where i want him stepping up.

Confidence

Totally agree.
 
Grealish is rarely bad but he's not pulling up trees and that's what people are expecting. TBH, I wish he could just be quietly left to go about his business: there's too much spotlight on him individually (as there is players in general) when the collective outcome is most important. It's the world we live in though.
Yesterday I cannot remember a player having so much of the ball in the first half with nothing to show for it.
He has to improve massively even if he was a 50 million pound player.
 
Now own up. Was anyone else thinking perfidiously, when Erling stepped up, “If he misses this, will he still be everybody's darling on here?” I actually thought KDB would take it. The foul was on him, and I just felt a bit more confident with him taking it. Was half-expecting the Viking freak to mess it up, if I'm honest. Which he nearly did. Wouldn't change a thing in my own evaluation of him, of course: a freak of nature.
I might have, if I'd any idea what it meant
 
What ever happened to the new ‘Rashford’ ruling on offside. If it’s so close, “the benefit of doubt is given to the attacker”. Was it only trialled for that one game? Great performance from City, KDB fantastic, as was Stones, Gundogan & Bernardo.
 
What ever happened to the new ‘Rashford’ ruling on offside. If it’s so close, “the benefit of doubt is given to the attacker”. Was it only trialled for that one game? Great performance from City, KDB fantastic, as was Stones, Gundogan & Bernardo.
Glad you raised this point, I mentioned it at the match yesterday but no one could recall it. Thought I’d imagined it.
 
Glad you raised this point, I mentioned it at the match yesterday but no one could recall it. Thought I’d imagined it.
If you recall, Rashford was offside by the naked eye v Liverpool; they stated that “last season he would have been offside, but this season for close calls, the benefit is given to the attacker”… so Rashford’s goal stood. Not happened in any other game to my knowledge
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.