Marvin said:Strongly disagree about Garcia he is a top class player. Unfortunately for him we have an established centre-back pairing and also have some very good defensive midfielders.
His control, and passing, tackling and heading is as good as anyones. I think he will go on to become a key player for City
Marvin said:Strongly disagree about Garcia he is a top class player. Unfortunately for him we have an established centre-back pairing and also have some very good defensive midfielders.
His control, and passing, tackling and heading is as good as anyones. I think he will go on to become a key player for City
Can't agree more about Kolarov.LoveCity said:Garcia wasn't bad at all, he's a typical "neat and tidy" holding midfielder, problem is we have too much of that and you need a balance with mobile and creative midfielders. Playing Barry and Garcia together doesn't work, it's either/or.
But Kolarov is abysmal, truly truly poor. For someone in his wage bracket you expect a high quality backup like Real Madrid have Coentrao.
Can't defend, not a great passer, has no pace to beat a man with. Crosses usually end up looking like shots or shots end up looking like crosses, it's hard to tell which is which sometimes because he just hammers it without much thought and most of the time it ends up in the crowd or nowhere in particular.
Txiki's biggest job this summer will be finding someone to take Kolarov and his wages off our books as that will be a priority if we're trying to reduce our wage bill. I don't think Helan would offer much less, he runs fast and scares defenders without having much of a footballing brain. Also isn't good enough for City but earns probably around £80,000/week less. A player of Kolarov's standard should earn no more than £40,000-£50,000/week.
True_Blue69 said:Glauber Berti said:Kolarov was gash, Garcia did alright in comparison to the overall team performance, thought he slotted in nicely when asked to be a centerback i think the full defensive unit looked a shambles including the CDM's because company was far to stretched covering for all 3 of the 'liabilities' we call defenders (Richards was just coming back from injury i know so unfair to make a judgement on tonights performance)
What?? Were you watching a different game? He certainly slotted in but it was anything other than nice, every time they went near him I thought they were gonna score. To be fair though I'd actually cut him some slack over being awful at the back as its not his position and we were all over the place as a unit.
Gelsons Dad said:I don't think either were the reason for our performance tonight. I actually thought Kolarov did ok. At least he was trying to get forward and do something. It was clear that Yaya was knackered, Sergio is not fully recovered and until the goal Tevez did most things wrong. Nasri was Nasri which doesn't help when Milner isn't on the pitch.
Rammy Blue said:Gelsons Dad said:I don't think either were the reason for our performance tonight. I actually thought Kolarov did ok. At least he was trying to get forward and do something. It was clear that Yaya was knackered, Sergio is not fully recovered and until the goal Tevez did most things wrong. Nasri was Nasri which doesn't help when Milner isn't on the pitch.
Opinions, opinions.
I think the 2 of them, plus Micah, were the main reason behind our shite performance.
Of course we were tired, however Garcia and AK were supposed to be two of our "fresh" players to come in and work hard and get about the pitch. They were shite which resulted in our other players having to attempt to compensate for the equivalent of playing with 9 men. We didn't have the gas in the tank to carry them. IMO, of course. ;-)
Danamy said:Rammy Blue said:Gelsons Dad said:I don't think either were the reason for our performance tonight. I actually thought Kolarov did ok. At least he was trying to get forward and do something. It was clear that Yaya was knackered, Sergio is not fully recovered and until the goal Tevez did most things wrong. Nasri was Nasri which doesn't help when Milner isn't on the pitch.
Opinions, opinions.
I think the 2 of them, plus Micah, were the main reason behind our shite performance.
Of course we were tired, however Garcia and AK were supposed to be two of our "fresh" players to come in and work hard and get about the pitch. They were shite which resulted in our other players having to attempt to compensate for the equivalent of playing with 9 men. We didn't have the gas in the tank to carry them. IMO, of course. ;-)
We desperately need a creative midfielder, someone who can hold possession and find the killer ball, when Silva doesn't play we lose our creativity, we become too predictable.
Blue Haze said:Neither are good enough. Staggering that we paid 32m combined for that, we won't get half of it back.
Marvin said:Garcia is better than any of Man Utd's midfielders
Best header of the ball at City, Best tackler. Doesn't give the ball away. Reads the game really well. Can play central defence as well as anyone.
In a game where we are struggling to break down the opposition, you don't need a sitting midfielder. That's the issue. Not his quality.
Clowns :-)