stony said:
Is that the same professionalism that has him cheering rag goals and groaning when one is scored against them?
Don't get me wrong, I think he's a decent pundit, probably the best of a very bad bunch. He's also a humourless prick.
You can’t blame him for having an allegiance to his former club, we would expect it of our own.
What makes him strand out as the best pundit by a mile is that he doesn’t let it affect his view and what he says. He is bang on with his criticism of utd in the same way whatever he says about us, positive or negative, is pretty much on the money. That gains him respect. Contrast that to Scholes who comes across as dower and negative in general and dropping little digs without offering anything insightful, woeful.