Gary Neville

Agree with that. There's the odd MU game when he loses his neutrality, often badly, or takes up an unsupportable position for some odd reason (Mane on Ederson), but that's about it.

Sterling made no attempt to play the ball, but played the man. Booking looked pretty obvious for that one.
Neither did the ones who took rodders down,both were fouls but one was booked and the other ignored
 
What a surprise tonight these 2 C@NTS are not looking at our fantastic play that carved out 30 shots but at our defending at corners! so they can show the rest of the premier if they didnt know already that that is one of our weak points, if by chance any team gets lucky enough to actually get a corner against our absolutely fantastic side.
I don’t think the rest of the premier league are reliant on Monday night football to point out our defensive problems from corners .
 
I'd say that Neville has been pretty fair to City overall ... (apart from the odd occasion when he's been in a funny mood for some reason / something has got to him ... then his bias has shone through).

But that said, if you can't say good things about City currently, when we're (arguably, but certainly statistically) playing the best football ever seen in the history of English football ... then there's surely no hope for any pundit / commentator ?
 
Hated him and a player, loathed him in fact.

But to be honest, I quite like him now and find his commentary pretty good. Maybe I'm not hearing what others hear, but for me anyway, I have no problem with it.

I find Andy Hinchcliffe worse to be honest. Sometimes it's hard to believe he's a blue.
What a great start to a post that was.............;-)
 
I quite liked Neville before he went to Valencia, since he has been back on the air after his clusterfuck attempt to actually manage a team rather than slag off someone else with the same failings, he seems to have turned into a right ****...! Once a ****, always a **** I suppose...!
 
Find him pretty fair tbh.

Do City fans just want constant praise for us on the tv?
I think he is generally fair but I am a bit suspicious of the way he has been pushing the "tactical fouls" narrative against City. Not one mention last night in a game (Wolves v Rags) which was littered with tactical fouls from both sides (just like most other Premier League games)
 
I think he is generally fair but I am a bit suspicious of the way he has been pushing the "tactical fouls" narrative against City. Not one mention last night in a game (Wolves v Rags) which was littered with tactical fouls from both sides (just like most other Premier League games)

Just to add to this, I don't think I've ever heard tactical foul mentioned in relation to any other club. To the ones who find Neville completely impartial, have you ever heard him mention it about another club? And if so, is it proportionate to the amount of times that it gets mentioned in relation to City?
 
Just to add to this, I don't think I've ever heard tactical foul mentioned in relation to any other club. To the ones who find Neville completely impartial, have you ever heard him mention it about another club? And if so, is it proportionate to the amount of times that it gets mentioned in relation to City?
He tries to sound neutral but inside him swirls 40 years of toxic City hatred which has reduced his brain to the size of a red walnut.
 
Just to add to this, I don't think I've ever heard tactical foul mentioned in relation to any other club. To the ones who find Neville completely impartial, have you ever heard him mention it about another club? And if so, is it proportionate to the amount of times that it gets mentioned in relation to City?
Agreed. Last night Pogba, Lingard, and McTominay did nothing else but tactical fouls and, to be fair, Wolves did exactly the same. It was a strange game with both sides scrapping near the half way line and waiting for breakaways. As I have said before, apart from mistimed tackles, all fouls are "tactical" and we commit less than most teams.
 
He's always been a good commentator and pundit because he reads the game well and analyses it fairly. Never noticed him showing "bias" during a commentary, but then unlike some football fans I'm not sitting there furiously looking for it. Like them all, he lets people know who his club are and has a joke about it, but it doesn't affect his analysis.

I bet there's a Man United forum somewhere where they are all accusing him of being "biased" because he was very negative about them last night after the game. Correctly.

Mostly this stuff is silly fan talk born from confirmation bias.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top