Gary Neville

Didsbury Dave said:
He's always been a good commentator and pundit because he reads the game well and analyses it fairly. Never noticed him showing "bias" during a commentary, but then unlike some football fans I'm not sitting there furiously looking for it. Like them all, he lets people know who his club are and has a joke about it, but it doesn't affect his analysis.

I bet there's a Man United forum somewhere where they are all accusing him of being "biased" because he was very negative about them last night after the game. Correctly.

Mostly this stuff is silly fan talk born from confirmation bias.
Click to expand...

He is two faced example bringing up Tactical fouling last season when all teams do it and in games saying thats another tactical foul on our games but when another team do it not a peep! They set the narrative.
 
waspish said:
He is two faced example bringing up Tactical fouling last season when all teams do it and in games saying thats another tactical foul on our games but when another team do it not a peep! They set the narrative.
Click to expand...

Sterling's was a "tactical foul". Big deal. It's topical about City because it is part of our game. It's no different to pointing out our weakness at corners, our pressing or our tactical overloads around the box.
 
Didsbury Dave said:
Sterling's was a "tactical foul". Big deal. It's topical about City because it is part of our game. It's no different to pointing out our weakness at corners, our pressing or our tactical overloads around the box.
Click to expand...

Ive no argument with it being brought up my argument is over teams do it when teams break and not a peep.
 
As I said in other thread, he tries to be pretty impartial and I'm pretty fine with that. Carragher on other side, I dream about violence as soon as I hear his fucking voice.
 
Didsbury Dave said:
He's always been a good commentator and pundit because he reads the game well and analyses it fairly. Never noticed him showing "bias" during a commentary, but then unlike some football fans I'm not sitting there furiously looking for it. Like them all, he lets people know who his club are and has a joke about it, but it doesn't affect his analysis.

I bet there's a Man United forum somewhere where they are all accusing him of being "biased" because he was very negative about them last night after the game. Correctly.

Mostly this stuff is silly fan talk born from confirmation bias.
Click to expand...
NQiUTdr.jpg

is he related to you?
 
Laughing at Bravo when the stretcher came on the pitch for him.

No concern shown for Ederson when he got booted in the face.

Subtle digs at City when he's commentating.

Great knowledge of the game, an excellent analyst but a prick, always has been a prick ane always will be a prick.
 
every goal we score, every game we win, every trophy we collect is like a dagger to his heart,fuck the rat faced rag weasel, dont be taken in by any feint praise he gives us,he hates us.
 
His face when Noel Gallagher said “it’s Hypocrite FC at Old Trafford isn’t it?! When City were spending money you lot were moaning but in the last five year when it’s been raining tenners at United, but oh, that’s alright now isn’t it?!”

He laughed, but he didn’t find it funny. He was furious inside. And his face didn’t hide it.
 
I don’t understand anybody who offers a defence for him on here.

He created the tactical fouling myth with his own hands and that narrative has been pushed across sky ever since.

That will naturally filter into the league as far as the refs are concerned, such is the huge fucking influence sky have on it.

By game it impacts there decision making and is just another bullet for the gun.

He is a rag loving cuñt. Never forget that.
 
On MNF he was complimentary on KDB but said Beckham was better. The stats on assists, chances created say otherwise you fucking Rat!
 
Proy said:
I don’t understand anybody who offers a defence for him on here.

He created the tactical fouling myth with his own hands and that narrative has been pushed across sky ever since.

That will naturally filter into the league as far as the refs are concerned, such is the huge fucking influence sky have on it.

By game it impacts there decision making and is just another bullet for the gun.

He is a rag loving cuñt. Never forget that.
Click to expand...
This,he has used and continues to use his position to take us down anyway he can,he tries to get any advantage he can for the rags,unfortunately for him it has been a lost cause
 
cookster said:
On MNF he was complimentary on KDB but said Beckham was better. The stats on assists, chances created say otherwise you fucking Rat!
Click to expand...
That's akin to a backhanded compliment. He's a condescending little shit. I gave him a fair chance as a pundit and he was ok, but the longer Man-ure are from winning another title, the more his sly bitter digs against us become noticeable.
 
He's hurting bad. Tyler is his lapdog too. They chatter on far too much whilst commentating with little or no regard for the game. So much so, their chatter becomes an irritating distraction. It's like going to a game with someone who isn't interested in what's happening on the pitch, very, VERY annoying. Particularly when City are doing amazing sequences of passing in the background. An absolute disgrace!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top