And what's your point with the name change?
We're talking about here and now and Corbyn has said he's against tackling IS abroad and is "uneasy" about police shooting dead people carrying out terrorist attacks. That's far worse than what's being proposed. He, as well as that clown Abbott, also have IRA links to their past, however that's not my point and wasn't in the post you've quoted.
That's a ridiculously cheap point to make as they're not on the list due to diplomatic processes that are now taking place between the US, Afghan government and the Taliban. Whilst they do commit terrorist acts, Washington believes it'd be detrimental to peace negotiations and we've supported that.
Libyans were "wandering around"? Well put them in jail then, why should they be walking? The bomber was from fucking Manchester and hadn't committed a crime previously. They are constantly stopping terror attacks and have done far better than our nearest neighbours. It's a difficult game when you're monitoring 3,000 people at anyone time whilst adhering, correctly too, to basic civil rights. You cannot throw criminals in jail before you've got evidence of the crime.
The difference between me and you is that you're blinkered and can't see past your political team. You vote red whatever the case and the Tories will always be scum to you, no matter what they do. Whereas I've voted both Labour and Tory.