I'm With Stupid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 May 2013
- Messages
- 20,343
I mean 'divisive' is an opinion. 'Anti-police' is an opinion. And 'trying to shoehorn a Marxist agenda into American politics' is a conspiracy theory that would embarrass David Icke. But it's nice to see that I was able to nail the talking points so accurately, because you've apparently gone for all of them.There is nothing to address. You proposed a false argument.
A. You take facts that are true "how BLM is anti-police, or divisive, or trying to shoehorn a Marxist agenda into American politics," e.t.c and call them bullshit nuance argument. In essence trying to undermine the fact they are true.
Arguing points I haven't made, I see.Then turn around and disparage the character of millions of Americans with no evidence to back it up
1. Black people are not being murdered by police. At least not at a number disproportionate to their level of interactions with the police.
I mean they're demonstrably not. Immediately after the news broke, there were a significant number of people online commenting that they were happy about him getting bail, he was only doing his job, etc. To a man (or woman), Trump supporters, which you can tell because on social media you can see all of their other posts, links and affiliations. Now there are lots of bots stirring shit up too, obviously.2. In the case where police misconduct has occurred such as in the Floyd case, everyone is appalled by Chauvin.
Hence why generalized pronouncement like yours really needs to go.