ChicagoBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 18,390
SWP’s back, I took you as less simplistic than that. It’s not the repeated non-compliance, which did serve to greatly escalate matters and led to guns being drawn in the first place, but the reaching into his car (with the officers blind to what he was doing) even as they tried to stop him from doing it, that got him shot.Fair enough, just need an amendment to your Constitution that formally recognised non-compliance as a death penalty offence and then your arguments would be correct.
No amendment is needed.