Get behind Mark Hughes

Hughes has rarely criticised his players, and when he has done so, it has been as a group without reference to an individual.


The leaks that keep coming from the club, after ever defeat I have a question for you. If this where the rags and it was no one from the coaching staff or playing staff that kept "leaking" these stories do you not think that Scottish low life would have the reporter in his office pretty quickly to explain himself. It seems to me that these stories have at least unofficial approval from the management, even if they are not directly from them(Gary Owen a club employee was spreading them over the weekend).
 
Blue Mooner said:
BobKowalski said:
...with you on this its one of the biggest mysteries of the whole affair

None of us really know who was part of this so called mutiny, maybe he was picking him not because he wanted to but because he felt he had no other better alternative.

What? Do you mean like a fit and waiting Neds O, who patiently waited his turn whilst 'experienced Prem players' such as TBH, continued to make a mockery of the word 'defender'?

Yeah, maybe there was no 'alternative'...
 
scottyboi said:
Bigga said:
I'm trying to work out why Vassell isn't 'behind Hughes' given that he's seen the benefit of Hughes' selection policies? Even been praised by Hughes for his 'work ethic'.

Now, according to many rumours, he's also in the 'Hughes Out' camp amongst the players! Oh and TBH, a HUGHES BUY!!

Work that one out!

been told tbh wasnt even a proper hughes sighning and frank wanted him earlier along with jo.

So all the good signing are Hughes and the shit others?

Ro
SWP

our 2 best players are they Hughes signings

Dont believe the hype
 
My main problem is this:

In the Notts Forest game Hughes did the following:

1/ played a formation that relied on Caicedo as the frontman, who failed to impose himself as the 'battering ram', thus rendering the formation completely ineffective.

2/ Switched to a 4-4-2 with a right footed defensive midfielder playing left wing.

3/ Brought off the 'left winger' Gelson Fernandes, an energetic if unintelligent footballer, who could at least have helped us to press the pace of the game, for Hamann, a player who sits back and has the mobilitiy of a dead horse.

4/ Moved our main, even our only, right footed creative player out to left wing in place of Gelson, a position he was clearly uncomfortable and ineffective in.

5/ Allowed an argument between Elano and Daniel Sturridge caused in part due to conflicting instructions from him and his staff to boil over and distract from the game.

6/ At 2-0 down with 20 minutes to go in a knock out game, the height of his creative tactical thinking was: a straight swap of the ineffective Caicedo for the inferior Jo, who has zero confidence and is easy bait for the fans.

7/ Sat like a fucking cabbage throughout the entire game on the bench, failing in any way to cajole, encourage or advise his players throughout the entire game. (He doesn't have to do what Pearce did, but he's allowed to stand up)

7/ Hung his players out to dry and accepted only very, very limited culpability for the defeat himself.

I'd defended him consistently before this, and I do accept that someone needs to break this supposed 'player power' attitude that has crept in behind the scenes. However, that player power reaction is in part down to his lack of man-management skills that has inspired very little loyalty in his staff. This wouldn't be such a worry but for the very serious questions the above raise about his managerial capability. He was already pissed on by Rafa Benitez in the home defeat to Liverpool due to a very basic switch by the opposition from 1 up front to 2 up front.

Does he have an eye for a quality footballer? Yes, I trust him with the transfer kitty.

Will he keep City in the league, comfortably? Yes, I believe so.

Is he the man to take us onto another level and break the top 4? The indications to me are that he absolutely is not.

I support him, and City, and feel like I'm one of the few people who even sing at COMS anymore, but this is my honest opinion.
 
Hi all.

Blackburn Rovers supporter here (don't hurt me!), just through I'd join up to add my thoughts to the debate as I've been reading it for awhile. Want to say first of all, I've always liked City even though my head and heart are obviously towards the blue and whites. I've found when talking to, or listening to discussions from City fans for them to be much more reasonable and down-to-earth (read: realistic) and even with this massive opportunity you now have, there seems to be a considered air around it as opposed to fans from certain other teams *cough* Newcastle for example.

What really prompted me to post was hearing another post match Hughes interview, against Notts F.

It reminded me of time, towards the end of his reign here when we were losing to teams we should have been able to beat, a la Coventry. He would often refuse to accept any responsibility for lost games against poor opposition, pinning it purely on the players and was able to 'spin' anything away from criticism to his regime. It really used to annoy Rovers fans who became increasingly aware of the deficiencies of his leadership.

Don't get me wrong, I loved Hughes and he worked wonders with our club which may be hard for other managers to match. I think given time, his progressive ideas and those of his staff will produce a fit, modern, solid football club, but it will take that... time.

My worry for City is that you are going to be expected to produce results fast and in style, anything else will be seen as a failure. Hughes has never had to contend with a team of ego's (world class players) and whether he is able to craft a team that has these type of players in, motivated, while having to keep some on the bench and happy remains to be seen.

I hope things go well for you all and you all stay grounded and give us a Manchester team with morals and who neutrals and other teams can look to, to do it the 'right' way. Personally, I say stick with Hughes, give him time and he will come good, but be prepared for him never to admit his own mistakes and to paint false rosey pictures when its obvious things aren't right.

On a side note. If you offer us £18 + a player, we will snap your hand off, both the club and the fans! Cruz has been unimpressive this season, he's had niggling injuries and we're scoring goals now. You'll be doing us a favour, we need the money! You'll find most Rovers fans will say the same, have him!
 
psychosoma said:
Hi all.

Blackburn Rovers supporter here (don't hurt me!), just through I'd join up to add my thoughts to the debate as I've been reading it for awhile. Want to say first of all, I've always liked City even though my head and heart are obviously towards the blue and whites. I've found when talking to, or listening to discussions from City fans for them to be much more reasonable and down-to-earth (read: realistic) and even with this massive opportunity you now have, there seems to be a considered air around it as opposed to fans from certain other teams *cough* Newcastle for example.

What really prompted me to post was hearing another post match Hughes interview, against Notts F.

It reminded me of time, towards the end of his reign here when we were losing to teams we should have been able to beat, a la Coventry. He would often refuse to accept any responsibility for lost games against poor opposition, pinning it purely on the players and was able to 'spin' anything away from criticism to his regime. It really used to annoy Rovers fans who became increasingly aware of the deficiencies of his leadership.

Don't get me wrong, I loved Hughes and he worked wonders with our club which may be hard for other managers to match. I think given time, his progressive ideas and those of his staff will produce a fit, modern, solid football club, but it will take that... time.

My worry for City is that you are going to be expected to produce results fast and in style, anything else will be seen as a failure. Hughes has never had to contend with a team of ego's (world class players) and whether he is able to craft a team that has these type of players in, motivated, while having to keep some on the bench and happy remains to be seen.

I hope things go well for you all and you all stay grounded and give us a Manchester team with morals and who neutrals and other teams can look to, to do it the 'right' way. Personally, I say stick with Hughes, give him time and he will come good, but be prepared for him never to admit his own mistakes and to paint false rosey pictures when its obvious things aren't right.

On a side note. If you offer us £18 + a player, we will snap your hand off, both the club and the fans! Cruz has been unimpressive this season, he's had niggling injuries and we're scoring goals now. You'll be doing us a favour, we need the money! You'll find most Rovers fans will say the same, have him!

Thanks Pyschosoma a really insightful view on Hughes and his managerial style.

I always find that some of the most objective assessments come from opposition fans who's judgement is not clouded by the passion and fervour of believing that we know the best thing for our club.
 
We have had the same type of discussions over the past couple of months over the Ince thing and its funny that if you look back over time, the debate has evolved in more or less the same way. You have moderate fans who will still back Hughes even when things are going badly but who become increasingly vocal in their disillusionment. I just hope he can turn it around before those fans also turn on him, because thats what happened with us and Ince lost the fanbase (rightly ;-)) and then his job.

Whats the biggest criticism from fans against Hughes? The main one?
 
psychosoma said:
Hi all.

Blackburn Rovers supporter here (don't hurt me!), just through I'd join up to add my thoughts to the debate as I've been reading it for awhile. Want to say first of all, I've always liked City even though my head and heart are obviously towards the blue and whites. I've found when talking to, or listening to discussions from City fans for them to be much more reasonable and down-to-earth (read: realistic) and even with this massive opportunity you now have, there seems to be a considered air around it as opposed to fans from certain other teams *cough* Newcastle for example.

What really prompted me to post was hearing another post match Hughes interview, against Notts F.

It reminded me of time, towards the end of his reign here when we were losing to teams we should have been able to beat, a la Coventry. He would often refuse to accept any responsibility for lost games against poor opposition, pinning it purely on the players and was able to 'spin' anything away from criticism to his regime. It really used to annoy Rovers fans who became increasingly aware of the deficiencies of his leadership.

Don't get me wrong, I loved Hughes and he worked wonders with our club which may be hard for other managers to match. I think given time, his progressive ideas and those of his staff will produce a fit, modern, solid football club, but it will take that... time.

My worry for City is that you are going to be expected to produce results fast and in style, anything else will be seen as a failure. Hughes has never had to contend with a team of ego's (world class players) and whether he is able to craft a team that has these type of players in, motivated, while having to keep some on the bench and happy remains to be seen.

I hope things go well for you all and you all stay grounded and give us a Manchester team with morals and who neutrals and other teams can look to, to do it the 'right' way. Personally, I say stick with Hughes, give him time and he will come good, but be prepared for him never to admit his own mistakes and to paint false rosey pictures when its obvious things aren't right.

On a side note. If you offer us £18 + a player, we will snap your hand off, both the club and the fans! Cruz has been unimpressive this season, he's had niggling injuries and we're scoring goals now. You'll be doing us a favour, we need the money! You'll find most Rovers fans will say the same, have him!


I think this is a really good post cheers
 
psychosoma said:
Hi all.

Blackburn Rovers supporter here (don't hurt me!), just through I'd join up to add my thoughts to the debate as I've been reading it for awhile. Want to say first of all, I've always liked City even though my head and heart are obviously towards the blue and whites. I've found when talking to, or listening to discussions from City fans for them to be much more reasonable and down-to-earth (read: realistic) and even with this massive opportunity you now have, there seems to be a considered air around it as opposed to fans from certain other teams *cough* Newcastle for example.

What really prompted me to post was hearing another post match Hughes interview, against Notts F.

It reminded me of time, towards the end of his reign here when we were losing to teams we should have been able to beat, a la Coventry. He would often refuse to accept any responsibility for lost games against poor opposition, pinning it purely on the players and was able to 'spin' anything away from criticism to his regime. It really used to annoy Rovers fans who became increasingly aware of the deficiencies of his leadership.

Don't get me wrong, I loved Hughes and he worked wonders with our club which may be hard for other managers to match. I think given time, his progressive ideas and those of his staff will produce a fit, modern, solid football club, but it will take that... time.

My worry for City is that you are going to be expected to produce results fast and in style, anything else will be seen as a failure. Hughes has never had to contend with a team of ego's (world class players) and whether he is able to craft a team that has these type of players in, motivated, while having to keep some on the bench and happy remains to be seen.

I hope things go well for you all and you all stay grounded and give us a Manchester team with morals and who neutrals and other teams can look to, to do it the 'right' way. Personally, I say stick with Hughes, give him time and he will come good, but be prepared for him never to admit his own mistakes and to paint false rosey pictures when its obvious things aren't right.

On a side note. If you offer us £18 + a player, we will snap your hand off, both the club and the fans! Cruz has been unimpressive this season, he's had niggling injuries and we're scoring goals now. You'll be doing us a favour, we need the money! You'll find most Rovers fans will say the same, have him!

Some interesting thoughts - do you subscribe to the theory that RSC is a one season wonder? He seems to have done nothing whatsoever this season to justify an 18M price tag - but then could this be down to his head being turned by constant rumours of a move to City.
 
He's lost the dressing room, he's lost most of the fans, he's losing the backing of the owners, his transfer policy and tactical decisions are baffling and his results record is shocking. For me it's time he went.
 
psychosoma said:
We have had the same type of discussions over the past couple of months over the Ince thing and its funny that if you look back over time, the debate has evolved in more or less the same way. You have moderate fans who will still back Hughes even when things are going badly but who become increasingly vocal in their disillusionment. I just hope he can turn it around before those fans also turn on him, because thats what happened with us and Ince lost the fanbase (rightly ;-)) and then his job.

Whats the biggest criticism from fans against Hughes? The main one?

The MAIN one? Fook me there are so many!!

Ok, let's see... Pick from: rubbish tactics, unfathomable reasonings for putting players in unsuited positions, lack of communication... I can't be arsed going into more!
 
psychosoma said:
Hi all.

Blackburn Rovers supporter here (don't hurt me!), just through I'd join up to add my thoughts to the debate as I've been reading it for awhile. Want to say first of all, I've always liked City even though my head and heart are obviously towards the blue and whites. I've found when talking to, or listening to discussions from City fans for them to be much more reasonable and down-to-earth (read: realistic) and even with this massive opportunity you now have, there seems to be a considered air around it as opposed to fans from certain other teams *cough* Newcastle for example.

What really prompted me to post was hearing another post match Hughes interview, against Notts F.

It reminded me of time, towards the end of his reign here when we were losing to teams we should have been able to beat, a la Coventry. He would often refuse to accept any responsibility for lost games against poor opposition, pinning it purely on the players and was able to 'spin' anything away from criticism to his regime. It really used to annoy Rovers fans who became increasingly aware of the deficiencies of his leadership.

Don't get me wrong, I loved Hughes and he worked wonders with our club which may be hard for other managers to match. I think given time, his progressive ideas and those of his staff will produce a fit, modern, solid football club, but it will take that... time.

My worry for City is that you are going to be expected to produce results fast and in style, anything else will be seen as a failure. Hughes has never had to contend with a team of ego's (world class players) and whether he is able to craft a team that has these type of players in, motivated, while having to keep some on the bench and happy remains to be seen.

I hope things go well for you all and you all stay grounded and give us a Manchester team with morals and who neutrals and other teams can look to, to do it the 'right' way. Personally, I say stick with Hughes, give him time and he will come good, but be prepared for him never to admit his own mistakes and to paint false rosey pictures when its obvious things aren't right.

On a side note. If you offer us £18 + a player, we will snap your hand off, both the club and the fans! Cruz has been unimpressive this season, he's had niggling injuries and we're scoring goals now. You'll be doing us a favour, we need the money! You'll find most Rovers fans will say the same, have him!

Great post, but I'm getting alarmed now. The price for RSC has risen from £17m to £18m (due to the exchange rate), NOW we are going to pay the same cash but with an adjustment of a recent £5m signing.
Im of the opinion that TBH needs to go if he's undermining Hughes, BUT SA has said he fancies the player. Why are we not saying £15m cash & we value TBH at £3m = £18m. Stinks of desperation. I'm worried if this comes off, as who is making these judgement calls. Is Hughes gambling that much to save his job that its spend, spend, spend at any cost?????
 
psychosoma said:
We have had the same type of discussions over the past couple of months over the Ince thing and its funny that if you look back over time, the debate has evolved in more or less the same way. You have moderate fans who will still back Hughes even when things are going badly but who become increasingly vocal in their disillusionment. I just hope he can turn it around before those fans also turn on him, because thats what happened with us and Ince lost the fanbase (rightly ;-)) and then his job.

Whats the biggest criticism from fans against Hughes? The main one?

For alot of people on here its the fact that he played for United which is totally out of order in my opinion.

Also people spout on without any facts to back them up such as

He's lost the dressing room - he may have fallen out with some of the lazy twats but no evidence to show that he has lost the whole dressing room and some clearly relish his style of management , he's lost most of the fans - what is your evidence for this a poll on a couple of forums, he's losing the backing of the owners - how do you know you spoken to our arab owners , his transfer policy - SWP, Kompany, Zabaleta and tactical decisions are baffling - agreed and his results record is shocking - not so better than Svens in the second half of last year. For me it's time he went - for me its time he was given the whole season with a squad of players that he can call his own
 
Trevski said:
Some interesting thoughts - do you subscribe to the theory that RSC is a one season wonder? He seems to have done nothing whatsoever this season to justify an 18M price tag - but then could this be down to his head being turned by constant rumours of a move to City.

His problem was he was being fed largely by bentley with crosses from the right. He is only really a goal threat if he is getting service from the wings, either to his head or for tap ins. His hold up play and the like is excellent but its useless unless you have people there to score from it. You might have with Robinho and SWP, but we dont have players to play off him nor the crossing of Bentley. He is more or less useless to us and the fact he has had his head turned so quickly, that he isnt prepared for a relegation fight and that he has been injured more than not this season, I'd let him go for a price like £18 (which he isnt really worth). But like most teams, we'll take you for a ride on the price for trying to turn our 'star' players.

I'd honestly say, benni Mc would be a far better and cheaper signing, he was better in his first season than RSC and is proving now he still has the goal threat.
 
Hughes is our manager and he isnt going to be sacked before the end of the season is he? So why cant people get behind him for gods sake. He is inherited a team of svens misfits and lets be honest bar ireland he has brought in our 5 best players in robhinio, kompany, zabletta, swp and bridge. Give the guy a fuckin season at least. People on here are moaning about the players he has picked but his job is picking 11 players out of a bad bunch. Judge Hughes on next season when he has had time to bring in who he wants, they have had time to gel, had a proper pre season ect..... Some city fans need a fuckin reality check as the money has obviously gone to there heads.
 
psychosoma said:
Hi all.

Blackburn Rovers supporter here (don't hurt me!), just through I'd join up to add my thoughts to the debate as I've been reading it for awhile. Want to say first of all, I've always liked City even though my head and heart are obviously towards the blue and whites. I've found when talking to, or listening to discussions from City fans for them to be much more reasonable and down-to-earth (read: realistic) and even with this massive opportunity you now have, there seems to be a considered air around it as opposed to fans from certain other teams *cough* Newcastle for example.

What really prompted me to post was hearing another post match Hughes interview, against Notts F.

It reminded me of time, towards the end of his reign here when we were losing to teams we should have been able to beat, a la Coventry. He would often refuse to accept any responsibility for lost games against poor opposition, pinning it purely on the players and was able to 'spin' anything away from criticism to his regime. It really used to annoy Rovers fans who became increasingly aware of the deficiencies of his leadership.

Don't get me wrong, I loved Hughes and he worked wonders with our club which may be hard for other managers to match. I think given time, his progressive ideas and those of his staff will produce a fit, modern, solid football club, but it will take that... time.

My worry for City is that you are going to be expected to produce results fast and in style, anything else will be seen as a failure. Hughes has never had to contend with a team of ego's (world class players) and whether he is able to craft a team that has these type of players in, motivated, while having to keep some on the bench and happy remains to be seen.

I hope things go well for you all and you all stay grounded and give us a Manchester team with morals and who neutrals and other teams can look to, to do it the 'right' way. Personally, I say stick with Hughes, give him time and he will come good, but be prepared for him never to admit his own mistakes and to paint false rosey pictures when its obvious things aren't right.

On a side note. If you offer us £18 + a player, we will snap your hand off, both the club and the fans! Cruz has been unimpressive this season, he's had niggling injuries and we're scoring goals now. You'll be doing us a favour, we need the money! You'll find most Rovers fans will say the same, have him!


This is exactly the issue with Mark Hughes and the total deficiency in his personality.

I don't know have far back the archives here go but the only gripe I had with Hughes when he was appointed was that I felt that he was a buck passer and someone who had always failed to take any sort of responsibility for anything that happened under his watch. I felt he was an embarrassment to his club and his profession in his two faced lying, and that's all it can be called when he constantly blamed any negative result on officials and anyone else who's door it could be laid at.

I know I am not the only City fan to have commented on this way before he was linked with us. In fact, most City fans I know agreed that he was as much or an embarrassment as Red Nose in this respect. Personally, I felt his buck passing and lack of grace exceeded even Red Nose, but so what.

If the archives go back far enough there will be one or two threads that had this conversation on them.

Despte this, I had no axe to grind and felt that he would do well. Especially if he cut out this constant buck passing and blaming of officials for things that he had imagined or was lying about.

To my delight, I have to admit that in the early months of his reign I felt he had done that and was pleased in this slight, but in my view, important change of attitude. It meant that he was not embarrassing the club in the way that I felt he embarrassed often Blackburn. The behaviour was not needed and did nothing but demean him and his club. He lost nothing by cutting it out.

In honesty I feel that he still hasn't resorted to constant blaming and lying about officials like he did at Blackburn, and that is only to his credit. You cannot knock this.

However, to my dismay it seems that the constant need for buck passing has not left him. It was unimaginable when he joined that instead of refs and anyone outside of the club, he would actually attempt to pin the complete and whole responsibility for his failure to produce results here on the players. Some of whom are viewed as model pros by almost everyone in football.

I would not have even given this the time of day if someone had suggested it at the start of the season. I could not imagine him stooping so low and being pathetic enough to attempt to wriggle out of his responsibilities in a manner that NO OTHER manager in top flight football has ever attempted.

Yet now the Blackburn fan above states that publicly blaming his own players for his own shortcomings was something that he relied on even in his Blackburn days. Frankly, it is pathetic and something that no top maanger, Red Nose, Wenger, Benetiz, whoever would ever resort to. If any top manager has ever attempted such a cowardly passing of the buck for his own responsibilities then I cannot rememeber it.

Yet here we have evidence of buck passing being a character trait elsewhere. I knew that already. It was my one and only gripe with him as a manager before he got here.

To find out that public buck passing to his own players for his own responsibilities is a trait that he has shown elsewhere though is unbelieveable and unforgivible.
 
psychosoma said:
Hughes has never had to contend with a team of ego's (world class players) and whether he is able to craft a team that has these type of players in, motivated, while having to keep some on the bench and happy remains to be seen.

This is worrying because at the moment the only world class player that we have at City is Robinho.

By world class I do not think that any of our squad - apart from Hamann who has had a long and successful career with Bayern and Liverpool but is now 36 and past it - has played at what I call a higher level for any period of time.

SWP, TBH and Bridge have all spent time at Chelsea but all struggled to make the starting 11 on a regular basis.

Who else has done anything world class?

Our goalies are both rookies, defenders Dunne and Ball played together at Everton, Micah and Ned are from the academy, and none of our midfield players or strikers - and I include Elano in there - have played for big clubs.

Yet they all seem to have massive ego's.

If Mark Hughes cannot control this lot how will he cope with a team of prima donna's?

It's quite frightening really.
 
JohnMaddocksAxe said:
This is exactly the issue with Mark Hughes and the total deficiency in his personality.

I don't know have far back the archives here go but the only gripe I had with Hughes when he was appointed was that I felt that he was a buck passer and someone who had always failed to take any sort of responsibility for anything that happened under his watch. I felt he was an embarrassment to his club and his profession in his two faced lying, and that's all it can be called when he constantly blamed any negative result on officials and anyone else who's door it could be laid at.

I know I am not the only City fan to have commented on this way before he was linked with us. In fact, most City fans I know agreed that he was as much or an embarrassment as Red Nose in this respect. Personally, I felt his buck passing and lack of grace exceeded even Red Nose, but so what.

If the archives go back far enough there will be one or two threads that had this conversation on them.

Despte this, I had no axe to grind and felt that he would do well. Especially if he cut out this constant buck passing and blaming of officials for things that he had imagined or was lying about.

To my delight, I have to admit that in the early months of his reign I felt he had done that and was pleased in this slight, but in my view, important change of attitude. It meant that he was not embarrassing the club in the way that I felt he embarrassed often Blackburn. The behaviour was not needed and did nothing but demean him and his club. He lost nothing by cutting it out.

In honesty I feel that he still hasn't resorted to constant blaming and lying about officials like he did at Blackburn, and that is only to his credit. You cannot knock this.

However, to my dismay it seems that the constant need for buck passing has not left him. It was unimaginable when he joined that instead of refs and anyone outside of the club, he would actually attempt to pin the complete and whole responsibility for his failure to produce results here on the players. Some of whom are viewed as model pros by almost everyone in football.

I would not have even given this the time of day if someone had suggested it at the start of the season. I could not imagine him stooping so low and being pathetic enough to attempt to wriggle out of his responsibilities in a manner that NO OTHER manager in top flight football has ever attempted.

Yet now the Blackburn fan above states that publicly blaming his own players for his own shortcomings was something that he relied on even in his Blackburn days. Frankly, it is pathetic and something that no top maanger, Red Nose, Wenger, Benetiz, whoever would ever resort to. If any top manager has ever attempted such a cowardly passing of the buck for his own responsibilities then I cannot rememeber it.

Yet here we have evidence of buck passing being a character trait elsewhere. I knew that already. It was my one and only gripe with him as a manager before he got here.

To find out that public buck passing for his own responsibilities is a trait that he has shown elsewhere though is unbelieveable and unforgivible.

To be fair, this buck passing which offends you so much, has some merit to it.

Unless you are prepared to stick your neck out and say that whatever XI players Hughes has put out, they have always given their all...

In fact, this is becoming the crux of my gripe with most of your lot JMA. Fine, I'm prepared to accept that Hughes has fucked things up pretty badly, otherwise we wouldn't be in the league position we're in...

However, EQUALLY, the players have fucked things up just as badly. There is no excuse for a professional footballer who is paid k's a week to simply not put a shift in because he doesn't like the manager, doesn't agree with his tactics, doesn't like training etc.

Basically you're scapegoating the manager whilst lambasting him for scapegoating the players.
 
mr t said:
psychosoma said:
Hughes has never had to contend with a team of ego's (world class players) and whether he is able to craft a team that has these type of players in, motivated, while having to keep some on the bench and happy remains to be seen.

This is worrying because at the moment the only world class player that we have at City is Robinho.

By world class I do not think that any of our squad - apart from Hamann who has had a long and successful career with Bayern and Liverpool but is now 36 and past it - has played at what I call a higher level for any period of time.

SWP, TBH and Bridge have all spent time at Chelsea but all struggled to make the starting 11 on a regular basis.

Who else has done anything world class?

Our goalies are both rookies, defenders Dunne and Ball played together at Everton, Micah and Ned are from the academy, and none of our midfield players or strikers - and I include Elano in there - have played for big clubs.

Yet they all seem to have massive ego's.

If Mark Hughes cannot control this lot how will he cope with a team of prima donna's?

It's quite frightening really.

Good post, I've always supported Hughes but the points you raise are valid. I can still remember Joe Royle trying to handle Weah & Wanchope - it was never going to work. I guess it really does take a SPECIAL type of GUY to work with these egotistic players, even given that some have such small credentials anyway. I have long thought that ADUG would want to bring in Jose, but would have to wait until summer.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top