Not pushing any agenda, but the case against privatisation has not been made. It is merely asserted as a bad thing, Yet both parties accept it is necessary. They disagree on the scale and on which parts. The NHS’s own campaign is pants, I have never seen any research which backs it up. If you think part privatisation is a bad thing, tell me why. (Personal example: the nhs does not provide dermatology services in my area due to small numbers so when I needed an operation for a cancerous growth, I was operated on by a private surgeon and the nhs paid the bill. Seems reasonable to me)
As for underfunding any public service feels it is underfunded, it is a way of life, but fine words butter no parsnips, they have to show how increased funding would improve matters.
Some examples:
why are many elective nhs services not available at weekends?.That effectively wastes 28% of capital investment.
Why do many imaging departments close at 4pm?
Why has so little progress been made in the establishment of hubs Of specialist excellence? Compare uk cardiac surgery costs with India.
How do trusts allocate budgets to departments? Is there a protocol?
What has been done to relieve the problem of bed blockers where no care is available on discharge?
There are hundreds of these structural budgetary issues which never seem to get resolved.
I worked for a major west London trust about 20 years ago. Recently the wife of an old friend‘s son became a nurse there. Questioning revealed that structural problems I encountered then are just as bad today.
So, while it would be great to increase funding, the nhs must tackle long standing problems first.