Give me an argument against this statement

[Soulboy]

I must plead ignorance here and ask the simple question.... what the fuck are you going on about?

I never once mentioned Chelsea, or Mourinho, or Abrahamovic.

Read my post again. It's about Hughes... you know, the guy that manages City.

You clearly have issues. With reading.

But you're suggesting the owners were buying players?

If true, I'd have even less faith in his abilities

Your post ended with this which although i don't believe for one minute is true, it would infact mean you would not want maureen as manager because Abrahamovic bought Shevchenko & that would mean you would not have" faith in his abilities".
I take it with all the anti hiddink stuff coming out this week which has been well reported on here you don't want him.
So as you've said "it's about Hughes"which pretty much sums what you are here(your choice) for, SO who do you want as our next manager ???????it's not directly a Hughes question so you may struggle but have a go.

I simply must repeat... what the fuck are you going on about?

You're talking about Mourinho and Abramovich... I never mentioned them.

I spoke of Hughes being responsible for HIS signings as I don't believe our owners would ever buy any player without the approval of the manager.

They've said that enough times before, and I believe them. Don't you?

So if all the signings done while Hughes was manager are HIS signings, then can we hear less of the tosh about the owners buying certain players... even though there in no evidence of them doing that.

Comprendi?

 

[bluemanc]

Your post ended with this which although i don't believe for one minute is true, it would infact mean you would not want maureen as manager because Abrahamovic bought Shevchenko & that would mean you would not have" faith in his abilities".
I take it with all the anti hiddink stuff coming out this week which has been well reported on here you don't want him.
So as you've said "it's about Hughes"which pretty much sums what you are here(your choice) for, SO who do you want as our next manager ???????it's not directly a Hughes question so you may struggle but have a go.

I simply must repeat... what the fuck are you going on about?

You're talking about Mourinho and Abramovich... I never mentioned them.

I spoke of Hughes being responsible for HIS signings as I don't believe our owners would ever buy any player without the approval of the manager.

They've said that enough times before, and I believe them. Don't you?

So if all the signings done while Hughes was manager are HIS signings, then can we hear less of the tosh about the owners buying certain players... even though there in no evidence of them doing that.

Comprendi?

Are you a bit thick or what,i've told you the link..infact i've actually told you twice i'm not doing it again.
So come again who do you want as manager??or is that to hard a question for you,normally i ignore myopics but in your case i'm going to make an exception.

 

[BlueMoonraker]

"Mark Hughes has spent almost a season and a half at Manchester City, with tremendous support from the club, and has managed to constantly take players and, over this period, make them perform way below the sum of their parts. This is not a sign of a capable manager."

Yes it is!

 

[BlueMoonraker]

[quote="BobKowalski"

Call me picky[/quote]

Hello Picky

 

[mancity1]

Not so much an argument against but rather the fact that Hughes is underperforming as are the players of the ilk he has purchased for most of this season.

The question is , will things turn around for the better and when and can Hughes deliver on this improvement he has said will occur.

How long do you put up with substandard performances and results before making changes after deciding rightly or wrongly that things will not in fact improve.