SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,064
Blue Smarties said:This is what I'm getting at. If I wanted to give to charity then I'd do so on my own back, not because I'm put on the spot by a cashier. The chances are the charities you're able to donate to via this method are limited, whose going to draw a list of these charities up? What if they don't have my charity on the list? Will I have to give it to someone else? Why should my chosen charities miss out on thousands of pounds because they either won't give the Government a % or because they're not deemed big enough?stony said:I detest this kind of intrusion. If I wanted to donate to charity I'd do it off my own bat without some do gooder rattling a fucking tin in my face.
The idea looks good on the surface but isn't so good when looked into deeper.
You are about as deep as a puddle.
You say intrusion. How is it coming up on the chip and pin intrusion. You can choose not to. It is all about freedom of choice.
You don't want any charities to benefit unless your chosen ones are on the panel?
You keep saying they will give the government a % but back that up with nothing (not to mention how it would also be illegal).
I suspect your OP was just another little dig after you and your peers current chagrin with the government. You make me sick with your mock outrage.
Grow up.