Grenfell Tower block disaster

Somebody somewhere made the choice to use the material that could go up. That person and maybe others need to go to jail for a long time. I am sure they thought they were just saving a few quid BUT their poor judgement has cost lives.

Jail is an option for major H and S irregularities and no doubt there was a need to have risk assessments and method statements so there should have been many construction as well as materials used checks with full traceability.
 
Does anybody know how bidding for this sort of council/public works contract is carried out?
Would the cladding material be specified by the building owners? Would the minimum fire-retardant factor be specified? Or would the material be specified by the contractors with the intention it would be approved or questioned by the owners?
If it's the third option; specified by contractors, would other bidders have specified the material to be used? It may be that competing bids were higher if a higher specification cladding was used. It may also be that other contractors also bid using the lower specification. It won't help the victims but I think we should know whether all contractors are willing to use a lower specification material.
And if the flammable stuff meets the requirements then where do we go from here?

Could be a variety of options mate. An architect would normally specify the material to be used via a performance specification. A client would issue a brief of what they want - the architect would develop that brief - issue some employers requirements and then the contractor may come back with a series of contractors proposals. It is a complex area.
 
Every family whose home was destroyed in the Grenfell Tower fire will receive a down-payment of at least £5,500 on Monday.

The Prime Minister has confirmed that each affected household is going to receive £500 in cash, as well as £5,000 delivered through the Department of Work and Pensions.

Downing Street says affected families can access the cash payment immediately from the council "as and when" they need it.

Number 10 has stressed that households who do not have a bank account will be given support to ensure they can access the rest of the down-payment.

The down-payment is part of a £5m support fund established by the Government in the wake of Wednesday's fire.

It is in addition to a guarantee of funding for temporary accommodation for the families unable to return to their homes, and funding for legal representation to ensure residents' voices are heard during a planned public inquiry.
 
http://www.probyn-miers.com/perspec...rnal-cladding-panels-perspective-from-the-uk/


Have a read of this. Think it's a few years old but it's scary reading

It's only a few months old. Winter 2016.

It is the most comprehensive thing I've seen and I'm surprised the firm hasn't been more prominent as real experts in the last few days.

If I get the gist right, the panels used probably met UK buildings regs (so a question mark over Hammond's comments this morning).

"Class 0 limits the rates of surface spread of flame and of fire propagation, but can be achieved by materials which are combustible in a fully developed fire."

But there should be a non-combustible stop at each floor (to stop the funnel / chimney effect in cavities) so there may be issues there on how it was done.

The Parliamentary report from 2000 is horrible to read - but does both mean that hindsight is wonderful and that the risks were known.

"The committee concluded:

18. The evidence we have received during this inquiry does not suggest that the majority of the external cladding systems currently in use in the UK poses a serious threat to life or property in the event of fire. …

19. Notwithstanding what we have said in paragraph 18 above, we do not believe that it should take a serious fire in which many people are killed before all reasonable steps are taken towards minimising the risks."

As such a fire could be started maliciously from the outside of buildings, locking up bins and clearing exterior rubbish has to be immediate priority.

And the overall conclusion seems to be that many such buildings will need physical alterations that would need scaffolding so costly that they mIght as well install new cladding. And the bottom line is that unaltered buildings may be uninsurable.
 
Last edited:
Every family whose home was destroyed in the Grenfell Tower fire will receive a down-payment of at least £5,500 on Monday.

The Prime Minister has confirmed that each affected household is going to receive £500 in cash, as well as £5,000 delivered through the Department of Work and Pensions.

Downing Street says affected families can access the cash payment immediately from the council "as and when" they need it.

Number 10 has stressed that households who do not have a bank account will be given support to ensure they can access the rest of the down-payment.

The down-payment is part of a £5m support fund established by the Government in the wake of Wednesday's fire.

It is in addition to a guarantee of funding for temporary accommodation for the families unable to return to their homes, and funding for legal representation to ensure residents' voices are heard during a planned public inquiry.


Four weeks rent in London, then what do they do?
 
Four weeks rent in London, then what do they do?
The money is additional to the temp accomodation being paid for,the council will arrange new homes for them,they'll get priority over everyone else on the list and stay in hotels till homes are found,i think the powers that be are doing good now after a shaky start
 
Death toll has risen from 58 - exact figure to be announced tommorow. Sky news.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.