You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Guidetti
- Thread starter Daz_Blue
- Start date
Sergi0 Na5r1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Dec 2014
- Messages
- 3,621
Great goal
His value should now have gone up slightly from the 2m being quoted last year.
His value should now have gone up slightly from the 2m being quoted last year.
His value is 0 because his contract is up and he dug in when City and Celtic tried to do a £3m deal in January. If he joined an English club we could get some decent training compo, but it's a very small amount if he goes abroad isn't it? Apparently Burnley will only get £200,000 for Ings in compo if he goes to Sociedad and he's much better than Guidetti.
Sergi0 Na5r1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Dec 2014
- Messages
- 3,621
LoveCity said:His value is 0 because his contract is up and he dug in when City and Celtic tried to do a £3m deal in January. If he joined an English club we could get some decent training compo, but it's a very small amount if he goes abroad isn't it? Apparently Burnley will only get £200,000 for Ings in compo if he goes to Sociedad and he's much better than Guidetti.
Dang
[quote="LoveCity"]His value is 0 because his contract is up and he dug in when City and Celtic tried to do a £3m deal in January. If he joined an English club we could get some decent training compo, but it's a very small amount if he goes abroad isn't it? Apparently Burnley will only get £200,000 for Ings in compo if he goes to Sociedad and he's much better than Guidetti.[/quote]
Didn't know we were in july? Them Memory Foam Mattresses...
What a bastard for diging in like he did, we loan out the Beast with a sell on clause, thus leaving us short up front, then give the lad confidence by sending him out on loan with a buy out clause for 5 mil, how unappreciative can you get..
Ings better than our John?
YHAFL..
Didn't know we were in july? Them Memory Foam Mattresses...
What a bastard for diging in like he did, we loan out the Beast with a sell on clause, thus leaving us short up front, then give the lad confidence by sending him out on loan with a buy out clause for 5 mil, how unappreciative can you get..
Ings better than our John?
YHAFL..
carlos tevez is a blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 16,121
blueincy said:[quote="LoveCity"]His value is 0 because his contract is up and he dug in when City and Celtic tried to do a £3m deal in January. If he joined an English club we could get some decent training compo, but it's a very small amount if he goes abroad isn't it? Apparently Burnley will only get £200,000 for Ings in compo if he goes to Sociedad and he's much better than Guidetti.
Didn't know we were in july? Them Memory Foam Mattresses...
What a bastard for diging in like he did, we loan out the Beast with a sell on clause, thus leaving us short up front, then give the lad confidence by sending him out on loan with a buy out clause for 5 mil, how unappreciative can you get..
Ings better than our John?
YHAFL..[/quote]
Ings seems to have more to his game than being a poacher, it was John's first goal in something like 12 games, playing the likes of Ross County and Kilmarnock whilst Ings is scoring at the swamp.
Kun Aguero said:blueincy said:[quote="LoveCity"]His value is 0 because his contract is up and he dug in when City and Celtic tried to do a £3m deal in January. If he joined an English club we could get some decent training compo, but it's a very small amount if he goes abroad isn't it? Apparently Burnley will only get £200,000 for Ings in compo if he goes to Sociedad and he's much better than Guidetti.
Didn't know we were in july? Them Memory Foam Mattresses...
What a bastard for diging in like he did, we loan out the Beast with a sell on clause, thus leaving us short up front, then give the lad confidence by sending him out on loan with a buy out clause for 5 mil, how unappreciative can you get..
Ings better than our John?
YHAFL..
Ings seems to have more to his game than being a poacher, it was John's first goal in something like 12 games, playing the likes of Ross County and Kilmarnock whilst Ings is scoring at the swamp.[/quote]
Scoring against that shower of shit makes him a better player? They are at the same level as the teams you mentioned. Also there is more to his game..Was JG given the chance to play against the rags..
Guidetti's 20 goals in 23 games for Feyenoord in 2011/12 were more than Larsson managed in any of his four seasons with the Dutch side. His personal best in Rotterdam was 16 in all competitions during his second season in the Netherlands...Henrik Larsson...
^
Have you watched Guidetti lately? Don't let the late goal against Inter fool you, he's slow and laboured, like a 32 year old striker whose legs have gone. In the PL, those extra seconds between getting the ball and shooting are often not there. Ings is miles better and I don't particularly want Ings here either. Guidetti has been demoted to the bench for Celtic in the SPL, just think how much space there is between that level and playing for a team that aspires to be the very best.
The Guidetti who was at Feyenoord was before that illness and the injury that followed his return. He isn't that teen prospect now, he's almost 23 and nothing special. And that is coming from a former cheerleader for him, who thought he was going to be big before said illness that put him out of the game for a year and half at a crucial stage of his development. He is simply light years from being a City standard player now. Even Stoke didn't fancy him when he was on loan there.
Go back to last summer when Pellegrini tested out the fringe players in preseason and Guidetti was the worst player in our entire squad. He was brutally bad and preseason is when the young ones are supposed to bust their arse to make an impression. He was outshone by Kelechi Iheanacho who at 17 already looked a better player. Now that's a real talent we should get our hopes up for, Guidetti's time for that has been and gone.
Have you watched Guidetti lately? Don't let the late goal against Inter fool you, he's slow and laboured, like a 32 year old striker whose legs have gone. In the PL, those extra seconds between getting the ball and shooting are often not there. Ings is miles better and I don't particularly want Ings here either. Guidetti has been demoted to the bench for Celtic in the SPL, just think how much space there is between that level and playing for a team that aspires to be the very best.
The Guidetti who was at Feyenoord was before that illness and the injury that followed his return. He isn't that teen prospect now, he's almost 23 and nothing special. And that is coming from a former cheerleader for him, who thought he was going to be big before said illness that put him out of the game for a year and half at a crucial stage of his development. He is simply light years from being a City standard player now. Even Stoke didn't fancy him when he was on loan there.
Go back to last summer when Pellegrini tested out the fringe players in preseason and Guidetti was the worst player in our entire squad. He was brutally bad and preseason is when the young ones are supposed to bust their arse to make an impression. He was outshone by Kelechi Iheanacho who at 17 already looked a better player. Now that's a real talent we should get our hopes up for, Guidetti's time for that has been and gone.
Rösler von Stretfordbömber
Well-Known Member
LoveCity said:^
Have you watched Guidetti lately? Don't let the late goal against Inter fool you, he's slow and laboured, like a 32 year old striker whose legs have gone. In the PL, those extra seconds between getting the ball and shooting are often not there. Ings is miles better and I don't particularly want Ings here either. Ings is simply a better player who does everything better. Guidetti has been demoted to the bench for Celtic in the SPL, just think how much space there is between that level and playing for a team that aspires to be the very best.
The Guidetti who was at Feyenoord was before that illness and the injury that followed his return. He isn't that teen prospect now, he's almost 23 and nothing special. And that is coming from a former cheerleader for him, who thought he was going to be big before said illness that put him out of the game for a year and half at a crucial stage of his development. He is simply light years from being a City standard player now. Even Stoke didn't fancy him when he was on loan there.
Go back to last summer when Pellegrini tested out the fringe players in preseason and Guidetti was the worst player in our entire squad. He was brutally bad and preseason is when the young ones are supposed to bust their arse to make an impression. He was outshone by Kelechi Iheanacho who at 17 already looked a better player. Now that's a real talent we should get our hopes up for, Guidetti's time for that has been and gone.
This all day long and then some. Looked fat and slow last summer. And even Sinclair generally looked good in those matches. Jovetic looked like a world-beater at times.
supercity88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 13,823
Scoring against that shower of shit makes him a better player? They are at the same level as the teams you mentioned. Also there is more to his game..Was JG given the chance to play against the rags..blueincy said:Kun Aguero said:blueincy said:[quote="LoveCity"]His value is 0 because his contract is up and he dug in when City and Celtic tried to do a £3m deal in January. If he joined an English club we could get some decent training compo, but it's a very small amount if he goes abroad isn't it? Apparently Burnley will only get £200,000 for Ings in compo if he goes to Sociedad and he's much better than Guidetti.
Didn't know we were in july? Them Memory Foam Mattresses...
What a bastard for diging in like he did, we loan out the Beast with a sell on clause, thus leaving us short up front, then give the lad confidence by sending him out on loan with a buy out clause for 5 mil, how unappreciative can you get..
Ings better than our John?
YHAFL..
Ings seems to have more to his game than being a poacher, it was John's first goal in something like 12 games, playing the likes of Ross County and Kilmarnock whilst Ings is scoring at the swamp.
Guidetti's 20 goals in 23 games for Feyenoord in 2011/12 were more than Larsson managed in any of his four seasons with the Dutch side. His personal best in Rotterdam was 16 in all competitions during his second season in the Netherlands...Henrik Larsson...[/quote]
Don't use the Dutch league to back up your beliefs on a players ability. What was Larsson's record for Celtic, what's John's?
Were Middlesbrough right to sign the goal a game Afonso Alves?
The Dutch league is the most skewed in all of Europe in terms of judging a player. For every Suarez there's a Dirk Kuyt. So many have looked so good there and done so little. Ryan Babel. Even Jozi Altidore. I've said it so much recently, as people are raving about Rekik and PSG's latest winger who looks great in a league where the quality is so lacking.
We were short on attacking quality, but we still won the majority of games whilst we played a false no.9.
Guidetti has been poor at Celtic recently. That one show of class can't justify us giving him a new contract or giving him game time. He may have a great career but it won't be at City. Ings is certainly a better player than Guidetti. He plays for a team up against it in the division but creates and takes his own chances. I don't want either at City, but Ings would be preferable if we had to have one.