I also think Hiddink might be getting on a bit. As a 62y old he still might have 5-6 seasons in him and I wouldnt mind him at City should Hughes fail. (note, he hasnt failed yet). But even though I've been a bit anti-Mourinho, I think he would be the best bet if he truly wanted to build a dynasty over several seasons and leave a legacy.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Guus Hiddink needs a new job.......
- Thread starter Rammy Blue
- Start date
Sparky has had his chance and spent £250m and now we play less attractive football than when Sven held the reins.
Fans may say "We have only lost once this season" but miss the point, that if Sven or Guus had spent £250m, then I`m sure things would be much more entertaining and productive.
In other words we wouldn`t be an expensive clone of Blackburn !
Fans may say "We have only lost once this season" but miss the point, that if Sven or Guus had spent £250m, then I`m sure things would be much more entertaining and productive.
In other words we wouldn`t be an expensive clone of Blackburn !
Layles
Well-Known Member
hmblue said:Sparky has had his chance and spent £250m and now we play less attractive football than when Sven held the reins.
Fans may say "We have only lost once this season" but miss the point, that if Sven or Guus had spent £250m, then I`m sure things would be much more entertaining and productive.
In other words we wouldn`t be an expensive clone of Blackburn !
well said
hmblue said:Sparky has had his chance and spent £250m and now we play less attractive football than when Sven held the reins.
Fans may say "We have only lost once this season" but miss the point, that if Sven or Guus had spent £250m, then I`m sure things would be much more entertaining and productive.
In other words we wouldn`t be an expensive clone of Blackburn !
Is wrong !!