Harry Kane

Maybe it's £100m and £400k a week over a 3 year deal or £300k a week over a 4 year deal......every time we buy someone the press always add it all together to make it look as if we are paying well over the odds?
 
Its not the money itself, but rather that spunking the quoted amounts on Kane when combined with whatever version of ffp is getting thrown at us now will stop us spending anything else. Basically we should be getting at least two players for £160m
 
Tell us the other strikers available around mate who would be good Aguero replacements and of course the source doesn't know the exact fee we'll probably see different fees tommorow that's if it's even true
Aguero on a 1-2 year extention and then worry about getting haaland when he costs less. I think i'd have taken ings in the short term even...if it meant getting haaland next year. Torres just scored a bunch for spain at the euro's playing as a forward...

Not to mention a bevvy of youngsters that we could have chanced(like daka).
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.