Harry Kane

[Bluemanc100]

All things considered i think we did alright without him...

But you’d have liked us to sign him wouldn’t you?

 

[Bluemanc100]

Hazard??? Not a success in my opinion

Not a success at Chelsea??

 

[oakiecokie]

My grandad used to say turning the pages of the Sun does not amount to reading a newspaper!

Hahahahhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa love that one melrose and never heard it before.

 

[Elliot houghton]

Aguero on a 1-2 year extention and then worry about getting haaland when he costs less. I think i'd have taken ings in the short term even...if it meant getting haaland next year. Torres just scored a bunch for spain at the euro's playing as a forward...

Not to mention a bevvy of youngsters that we could have chanced(like daka).

Maybe but even Haaland next year would cost us 600k a week I'm not sure we'll ever pay that Daka might have been good but a risk as never playing in a top league before

 

[Bill Walker]

Yep, because no club has ever had two top strikers at the same time lol ..do I really have to spell it out to you? rotation, they would both play a lot of games each and a good chance one will be injured at some point

Well now that you mention it, Kane does look fucked these days

 

[blueparrot]

Not a success at Chelsea??

He did okay at Chelsea, and Chelsea , but us missing out also wasn't any disaster either wed did okay too.

 

[Nascent Blues]

He would def sign for City if we could get Dortmund to agree, but it may actually be that Pep fancies Kane more for the way he wants to play. He's got us this far and most of his buys have worked.

Which pretty much sums up my stance: be positive about the top class player that it looks like we will get and which the top brass at the club (including Pep) want, rather than a top class player we won't get, whether for the reasons that the club/Pep don't fancy him, or he just doesn't want to come, or any other reason the fans aren't privy to.

 

[Brewster's millions]

Personally I’d be happy if we didn’t spend any major money this summer - I don’t think that the transfer market can withstand another year of COVID disruption and our comparative advantage - our finances - will only increase. I have a particular dislike for Spurs so I have no real desire to see us bail them out on the financial side.

Without sounding like a prophet of doom, I would also think that the current wave of COVID may have altered our transfer plans somewhat, given the risk of reduced crowds etc. The outlook now is different from the spring when the vaccine rollout started, and the affordability of some of our transfer targets has probably reduced as a result.

 

[Bluemanc100]

Personally I’d be happy if we didn’t spend any major money this summer - I don’t think that the transfer market can withstand another year of COVID disruption and our comparative advantage - our finances - will only increase. I have a particular dislike for Spurs so I have no real desire to see us bail them out on the financial side.

Without sounding like a prophet of doom, I would also think that the current wave of COVID may have altered our transfer plans somewhat, given the risk of reduced crowds etc. The outlook now is different from the spring when the vaccine rollout started, and the affordability of some of our transfer targets has probably reduced as a result.

It’s double jeopardy for me… I don’t want Kane and I want to boost Spud’s coffers even less

 

[philjoneswho?]

That is true.

Though my is point missed, I am not criticisim Cityxtra and the job they do

They have tweeted several times today with city news only the two of there post have been shared, the ones with the most untrustworthy sources so, I was ctiticising the repetative sharing of the same bollocks story they link by posters here not them lomking it.


But I seem to have offened you and some with a gif, I am so sorry that it was taken so badly by some.

Looks like Happy Hour where you are pal...