Harry Kane

[Gorton_Tubster]

One wants to play for City the other doesn’t, devils advocate

Yup if that's true it doesn't matter, go for kane.

 

[BlueBanger]

£160m on a 28yr old v £160m on a 20yr old. Both of equal potential

Haaland is already a monster and already the better player for me. Fast, powerful, quick feet for a big lad, and an incredible finisher to boot...at 21.

 

[abu13]

I cant see this having any truth, but it could well be a positive going forward.

Everyone sees the £160 million figure and if we actual go to say £110 million then it looks like we got a good deal.

 

[blueparrot]

£160m on a 28yr old v £160m on a 20yr old. Both of equal potential

Why do you think we would do that?

 

[Gorton_Tubster]

Haaland is already a monster and already the better player for me. Fast, powerful, quick feet for a big lad, and an incredible finisher to boot...at 21.

Same for me. He's got ten years in him too.

 

[Gorton_Tubster]

Why do you think we would do that?

Do what? I didn't say we should do anything?

 

[samuelyeboah]

haaland is not better than kane

 

[Onholiday(somemightsay)]

Messi, Mbappe, Ronaldo (someone likeable like The Goat) for £180m a far better deal

 

[urban genie]

Looks lilenhe is coming evemtually and I am very happy to have him arrive.

The fee/wages will never be truly known and I take little notice of what the press will say it was.

Just enjoy and celelbrate the goals he will score and moan at the misses(what we do well) , don't worry about the rest

 

[Sir peace frog]

haaland is not better than kane imo

edited