Harry Kane

BillyShears said:
Kane is technically on another level to Haaland. That's not a dig at Haaland either, because the boy has got YEARS to improve and no doubt his ceiling is as high as Kane's if not higher. It's just right now, Kane can already play as a playmaker in midfield and his passing technique and his vision are almost KDB'esque at times.

I guess I'm trying to say that I think that Kane has tons of 'style' to his game. In many respects he's very similar to Grealish in that he's got a bit of nasty Englishness about him, but also got bags of technique. Not sure how Jacky boy has ended up as the toast of Bluemoon whilst Kane is considered to be an unsexy lump.
Click to expand...
I'd have kane in a heartbeat. We won't get a chance to sign him again if we don't do it now.
He will score goals by the bucketful, for me he's the perfect centre forward who has every kind of goal in his locker.
Really can't wait to see him in the blue shirt.
 
BillyShears said:
Kane is technically on another level to Haaland. That's not a dig at Haaland either, because the boy has got YEARS to improve and no doubt his ceiling is as high as Kane's if not higher. It's just right now, Kane can already play as a playmaker in midfield and his passing technique and his vision are almost KDB'esque at times.

I guess I'm trying to say that I think that Kane has tons of 'style' to his game. In many respects he's very similar to Grealish in that he's got a bit of nasty Englishness about him, but also got bags of technique. Not sure how Jacky boy has ended up as the toast of Bluemoon whilst Kane is considered to be an unsexy lump.
Click to expand...
Yeah well for me it's like with Rodri. He's a really dull player for a casual fan to watch, but he's fantaastic at receiving the ball in midfield (and under pressure) and playing that right pass to keep the team ticking. And because of that dullness he often is rated poorly. Gundogan before the goalscoring streak was similar.

Kane's got great technique, remember the left footed volley in the Euros? It's just he has a very English way of playing, and is seemingly dull off of the pitch. Whereas Haaland (who I rate immensely) is this giant speedfreak with a unique look and some insane finishing ability, all whilst being a character off of the pitch.
BillyShears said:
I thought it was the calves but you could be right!
Click to expand...
Well it's not the accent is it?
 
Beaker said:
I don’t read the Sun and I don’t believe the figures bandied around, I like to think that City wouldn’t pay that amount of money. My comment is aimed not at people who dispute the figures but at people who come out with comments such as it’s not our money so why should we care how much we spend and people desperate for signings irrespective of cost and long term implications based around wages etc. I want the squad to improve as much as anybody but not at any cost and I will be disappointed but not too down hearted if new signings don’t come in.
Click to expand...
Are you suggesting the current Board have NO idea as to what they are doing with the finances ??
We will have generated more than £200M from our wonderful cup runs and PL win plus god knows how much from TV and player sales.
Nah. They havn`t got a fucking clue how to run a football club !!
Shame on you City.
 
If he can put out the numbers for us he has whilst playing for Spurs...that's all I am doing, using my imagination by playing the number one striker in the PL in my mind without being unreasonably blue-tinted (I hope) about it.

Trusting the powers-that-be at City. Comfy. Very comfy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.