LangleyBlue1970
Well-Known Member
What if he doesn’t want to come? Kidnap him?For the sums quoted I'd rather we took Haaland
the arrogance that we just expect players to want to come.
What if he doesn’t want to come? Kidnap him?For the sums quoted I'd rather we took Haaland
We've made a lot of money in sales from the academy for one, plus I believe some of last season's sales weren't accounted for until now (or something of that ilk).How are we affording these proposed transfers? Didnt we just post a huge loss and take a $650m debt facility
Kev’s earned it.Haha squad harmony. If KDB is on £375k a week, that harmony won't be destroyed with someone coming in on 'just' £25k more per week.
Why do you assume there was a choice?For the sums quoted I'd rather we took Haaland
Course, Kane hasn’t done anything has he to justify a monster pay day transfer. The absolute irony though that everyone is calling for haaland who would cost and demand more. Who literally had done a fraction of Kane.Kev’s earned it.
He didn’t start on that and has won and earned enough medals to justify that wage.
The vote on this thread backs up your view.I think there is an underlying feeling that st Harold of Kane just isn't worth it.
For the sums quoted I'd rather we took Haaland
What a weird reply.What if he doesn’t want to come? Kidnap him?
the arrogance that we just expect players to want to come.
No you said I’d rather take Haaland, like as though we have a pick of either. We don’t.What a weird reply.
I never said anything arrogant in the slightest, I said I preferred Haaland to Kane at the sums quoted, what the fuck is arrogant about that?
This is the transfer forum, to discuss who we would like to see play for our club, fuck me, some people get their knickers in a twist about all manner of things on here nowadays.
Arrogant lol fucking hell.
Should I search the Messi thread for your similar reply in there?
Think it's come down to one wants to come and play for us and the other don'tFor the sums quoted I'd rather we took Haaland