GaudinoMotors
Well-Known Member
DefinitiveThe vote on this thread backs up your view.
DefinitiveThe vote on this thread backs up your view.
Because I am allowed a fucking opinion, is it that hard for you to understand?What does it matter? Are you financing the deal? You can “rather we took Haaland” all you want, at the end of the day Pep wants Kane and that’s who we’ll get
What if he doesn’t want to come? Kidnap him?
the arrogance that we just expect players to want to come.
It was just my opinion pal, that's all no biggie.Think it's come down to one wants to come and play for us and the other don't
The debt facility is for CFG, not City, and is for infrastructure for the group, such as a stadium for NYCFC or training facilities in Melbourne etc. It doesn't mean City are broke!How are we affording these proposed transfers? Didnt we just post a huge loss and take a $650m debt facility
Raz has been shite all year for usRaz has put in the hard work and might get to kevs level this time , a new player coming in on a long contract at more than kev ? Ridiculous
Just pay it.The absolute irony though that everyone is calling for haaland who would cost and demand more.
I will bold the bit that you are struggling to comprehend, the rest is some weird thing you have decided to take offence at, for whatever reason.No you said I’d rather take Haaland, like as though we have a pick of either. We don’t.
There’s just one or two on here who seem to think we can demand Haaland, that’s all. You clearly aren’t one, so sorry.I will bold the bit that you are struggling to comprehend, the rest is some weird thing you have decided to take offence at, for whatever reason.
Sorry, me thinking Haaland is a better long term prospect has got you all hot and bothered.
Must be the sun.
Anything less would be a failure especially at the crazy fees being brandied about. We have won everything else without him.