It was so predictable that the blue tinted brigade would suggest Sancho is crap.
7 years ago Kane was on loan at Leicester not tearing it up in the Bundesliga.
A bit of objectivity goes a long way.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
7 years ago Kane was on loan at Leicester not tearing it up in the Bundesliga.
A bit of objectivity goes a long way.
BigBaz1230MCFC
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jul 2017
- Messages
- 56
Oh and they waited a year For him and won fuck all in that time!
And they signed cavani who is 6 years older than Kane and there best forward
Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Apr 2019
- Messages
- 18,384
- Team supported
- FC Zurich (and city of course)
You'll probably find that the rags have paid more and there will be all sorts of add-ons / performance related things that are unreported.So Sancho who is 22 has been bought for 70m. United probably get a decade out him.
No way we pay double that for a 28 year old.
Whoever we sign the fee will go up every time it's reported and add one included from the outset.
BigBaz1230MCFC
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jul 2017
- Messages
- 56
10 million comments and still no signing , I thought aliens had invaded and taken Harry with them
Nellies left peg
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 9,809
İf Pep rated him İ'm sure he would still be here. Time will tell and see if he turns into a Billy big bollocks like the rest of themIt was so predictable that the blue tinted brigade would suggest Sancho is crap.
7 years ago Kane was on loan at Leicester not tearing it up in the Bundesliga.
A bit of objectivity goes a long way.
Kane in the City team is more frightening than Haaland in that Chelsea team. Simple as that so fuck whatever anyone else says or these stupid twitter profiles. We’re signing the best striker in the premier league for the last 3 seasons or so. How the fuck can anyone not be happy with that?
citymad
Well-Known Member
Or MbappeFor the sums quoted I'd rather we took Haaland
citymad
Well-Known Member
Beg to differ. Haaland will be incredible. Has so much more speed to get away from defenders.Kane in the City team is more frightening than Haaland in that Chelsea team. Simple as that so fuck whatever anyone else says or these stupid twitter profiles. We’re signing the best striker in the premier league for the last 3 seasons or so. How the fuck can anyone not be happy with that?
Last edited:
MadchesterCity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 18,080
100% agree, if we get Kane he will improve our starting 11 but we have to pray Chelsea don't get Haaland or they'll overtake usBeg to differ. Haaland will be incredible. Has so much more speed to get away from defenders.
The Black Shed
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Oct 2012
- Messages
- 3,993
£160m eh?
You could build a hospital for that amount. Or a similarly large building TO HOUSE ALL THE FUCKING TROPHIES CITY ARE GOING TO WIN, COS WE AREN'T SLOWING DOWN FOLKS, FULL STEAM AHEAD CHOO CHOOO!
You could build a hospital for that amount. Or a similarly large building TO HOUSE ALL THE FUCKING TROPHIES CITY ARE GOING TO WIN, COS WE AREN'T SLOWING DOWN FOLKS, FULL STEAM AHEAD CHOO CHOOO!