Haaland’s wage demands would be a huge sticking point for us whereas Kane’s wouldn’t. The problem with the Kane deal will be the fee I believe.
Both will have similar wage expectations. Both are a similar fee.
Haaland’s wage demands would be a huge sticking point for us whereas Kane’s wouldn’t. The problem with the Kane deal will be the fee I believe.
Big difference is haaland doesn’t want to come to city so it’s just fantasy speculation about him coming to us anyway . He will be at Madrid next august .Both will have similar wage expectations. Both are a similar fee.
He does appear to, although the last one was about Jorginho joining...This guy gets the odd nugget sounds very interesting
Spurs won't go financially bust with levy in charge definitely. They WILL sacrifice the football,the style, the chance to break away from being Spursy.Short of a COVID resurgence shutting down stadiums or football altogether for another 2-3 years (in which case, pretty much every club on the planet will go bust), why would that happen?
Definitely a fine balancing act and mutually acceptable ground needs to be found.Good question.
It depends on the player, really. Luka Modric was desperate to join Chelsea in 2011 but Levy refused to sell. Modric went on to have an outstanding season before joining Real Madrid the following summer.
Kane, likewise, is desperate to join City this summer. My guess is that, if denied that opportunity, he will also act professionally. He has too much personal ambition and pride to waste a season by sulking or refusing to play or train to his utmost.
On the flip side, I could ask whether you would sell arguably the best all round striker / creator in the world; a home grown player; a talisman; the England captain; for less than you believe him to be worth when he still has 3 years remaining on his contract? That will be Daniel Levy’s stance.
Big difference is haaland doesn’t want to come to city so it’s just fantasy speculation about him coming to us anyway . He will be at Madrid next august .
I think Levy also needs to take into account blocking big moves for his players can turn away potential signings in the future.Good question.
It depends on the player, really. Luka Modric was desperate to join Chelsea in 2011 but Levy refused to sell. Modric went on to have an outstanding season before joining Real Madrid the following summer.
Kane, likewise, is desperate to join City this summer. My guess is that, if denied that opportunity, he will also act professionally. He has too much personal ambition and pride to waste a season by sulking or refusing to play or train to his utmost.
On the flip side, I could ask whether you would sell arguably the best all round striker / creator in the world; a home grown player; a talisman; the England captain; for less than you believe him to be worth when he still has 3 years remaining on his contract? That will be Daniel Levy’s stance.
At around £130m for Kane the only pissing that’ll be being done will be from laughing.I want both transfers, Kane and Jack, to happen, would be a huge statement of intent, but I would like them to be both cheaper than is being quoted. Now that would piss a lot of none Blues off.
He'll go where the biggest offer isBig difference is haaland doesn’t want to come to city so it’s just fantasy speculation about him coming to us anyway . He will be at Madrid next august .
Sam Lee knows fuck allso was the sun story simply bullshit? even sam lee says spurs communicated to kane that he's staying.