Harry Kane

[clarion]

We all have different stories to tell.

Be my guest.

 

[blueparrot]

Be my guest.

I’m not the one posting definitively what our maximum spend on a striker is. Only Soriano and Khaldoon probably have a figure they would say no to, and that would depend on which player.
My personal guess is they would go up to £150 mill including add ons for the right player. I think Kane is that player this summer.

 

[Semper aggressus]

All day long.
Our striker budget is 100mil.

End of story.

Does that include add ons such as agent‘s fees, etc?

Also, if Spurs wanted say £110m are you saying we’d risk missing out on the one position that would see us dominate for two or three seasons for the sake of another £10m? At least we could negotiate and pay more over longer time or after a certain amount of goals/trophies/games?

It’s ludicrous if we ruin the team and possibly months of negotiations because we flatly refuse to consider a higher price. I get we may not pay £160m but there’s got to be some flexibility, particularly for such a key and urgently required signing.

 

[salfordbluetrue]

Next week he’ll be a week older.

so which one will you use 28 years old or 1456 weeks old, next week he is a year older

 

[clarion]

Does that include add ons such as agent‘s fees, etc?

Also, if Spurs wanted say £110m are you saying we’d risk missing out on the one position that would see us dominate for two or three seasons for the sake of another £10m? At least we could negotiate and pay more over longer time or after a certain amount of goals/trophies/games?

It’s ludicrous if we ruin the team and possibly months of negotiations because we flatly refuse to consider a higher price. I get we may not pay £160m but there’s got to be some flexibility, particularly for such a key and urgently required signing.

It is also the question of reputation:
We werewe are not any more ‘we have money-we buy every player-we spend 100mil’ club.

We also don’t need it.
We buy smart.
We win it in smart way.

 

[LongsightM13]

so which one will you use 28 years old or 1456 weeks old, next week he is a year older

Come on lads, we’re not Arsenal fans FFS…

 

[Tangled up in blue.]

so which one will you use 28 years old or 1456 weeks old, next week he is a year older

Will his price come down then if he's a year older

 

[Blue Smarties]

so which one will you use 28 years old or 1456 weeks old, next week he is a year older

He’ll be a week older mate.

 

[Semper aggressus]

It is also the question of reputation:
We werewe are not any more ‘we have money-we buy every player-we spend 100mil’ club.

We also don’t need it.
We buy smart.
We win it in smart way.

The smart way is to give the best manager in the world the best players available. Sometimes that means spending a lot, to get the very best.

The smart way to win is stick the ball in the damn net instead of fluffing so many of the great chances our team creates.

 

[salfordbluetrue]

Will his price come down then if he's a year older

Highly unlikely but we will not be buying a 27 year old as all the press described him this week,most likely on a 5 year deal