Harry Kane

giphy.gif

Alright, now you're just showing off.
 
I clicked on the “show this content” button after someone sent me a message saying there’s a couple of lads been trying to get my attention for days. Very sweet but I’m not shagging either of them.
Cheers. Keep posting as and when you hear 'owt. Not all of us are out for blood.
 
It would’ve been easier to sign Haaland or Messi. It is quite funny how much Pep wants Harry.

Kane is Peps perfect striker if you watch Kane last season he did everything Pep would want from his striker. He pressed, linked up play with his brilliant passing, assisted the wingers. Scored loads of Goals. Peps probably like a kid at Christmas waiting for this deal to go through. Kane takes City up to another level. Can’t wait for him to be in the City shirt
 
Certainly seems to have his heart set on him. I wonder if a part of that is they feel Kane has done his bit in trying to force the move. Might not bode well for future targets if we just bailed on him now because Levy is being difficult to deal with?
Which is why I expect this will eventually get done & we'll probably pay over the odds to get him. It sounds like the club are trying to sell Bernardo to fund this deal so until his future is sorted the deal will stall.
 
I will be learning "We Didn't Start The Fire" on guitar today in honour of this thread and the things I read this morning before Ric decided to nuke all the evidence.

It is amazing how so many people who are on my ignore list seemingly spend so much time writing about me on Bluemoon. I guess I leave an impression even with those people I go out of my way to avoid ;)
The internet is serious business.

Announce Kane.
 
Which is why I expect this will eventually get done & we'll probably pay over the odds to get him. It sounds like the club are trying to sell Bernardo to fund this deal so until his future is sorted the deal will stall.
If that was the case, why did we do the Grealish deal first?

Grealish had his release clause and we could do that deal at any time.

To me a striker was a far more important deal for us to complete first.

If after completing the Kane deal and we had the funds, sign Grealish.
 
If that was the case, why did we do the Grealish deal first?

Grealish had his release clause and we could do that deal at any time.

To me a striker was a far more important deal for us to complete first.

If after completing the Kane deal and we had the funds, sign Grealish.
I think the Grealish clause had a time limit. It had to be triggered by a certain date, if it wasn’t then I reckon Villa would be pulling a Levy on us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cbl
I will be learning "We Didn't Start The Fire" on guitar today in honour of this thread and the things I read this morning before Ric decided to nuke all the evidence.

It is amazing how so many people who are on my ignore list seemingly spend so much time writing about me on Bluemoon. I guess I leave an impression even with those people I go out of my way to avoid ;)
Video of you playing guitar, with Harry Kane sat next to you singing backing vocals, or it didn't happen.
 
I think the Grealish clause had a time limit. It had to be triggered by a certain date, if it wasn’t then I reckon Villa would be pulling a Levy on us.
Sorry but I don't believe that, the clause would have lasted the length of his contract.

If it did have a time limit, fair enough, I was not aware of that.

And if Kane and his reps had the same foresight , we would not be in this crazy situation.
 
I think the Grealish clause had a time limit. It had to be triggered by a certain date, if it wasn’t then I reckon Villa would be pulling a Levy on us.

Yeah it expired a few days after we signed him - from what Sam Lee said, Villa tried stalling accepting City's bid to after the date, as City ostensibly shouldn't have been aware of the clause. Grealish and his camp mentioned legal action if they didn't accept the bid, due to the release clause.
 
If that was the case, why did we do the Grealish deal first?

Grealish had his release clause and we could do that deal at any time.

To me a striker was a far more important deal for us to complete first.

If after completing the Kane deal and we had the funds, sign Grealish.
I think they assumed the injuries to Kev/Foden was worse and Bernardo would find a buyer faster. Silva/Kev/Foden all missing the start of the season.
 
No - outside of a select few, I’d imagine no-one knows which way this one’s going to end.

But that’s never stopped our friends in the media printing endless drivel about it before!
Agree with this.. typical drivel example is that Kane holidayed in the Bahamas and then the States……unless I’m mistaken uk residents are not allowed to visit the USA….just shows how much research the media really do
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top